Tracy Caekaert, et al v. Watch Tower Bible & Society of Pennsylvania, et al
| WATCHTOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK, INC., BRUCE MAPLEY, Sr., WATCHTOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK and WATCH TOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| TRACY CAEKAERT and CAMILLIA MAPLEY |
| WATCH TOWER BIBLE AND TRACT SOCIETY OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC. and PHILIP BRUMLEY |
| 23-35329 |
| May 10, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellees Tracy Caekaert and Camillia Mapley reply to response (motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, motion for sanctions). Date of service: 06/12/2023. [12733813] [23-35329] (Shaffer, Ryan) [Entered: 06/12/2023 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant Philip Brumley response opposing motion ([ # 4 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 4 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 4 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 06/05/2023. [12728498] [23-35329] (Shatz, Benjamin) [Entered: 06/05/2023 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 8 Added Attorney(s) Benjamin Eli Strauss for party(s) Appellant Philip Brumley, in case 23-35329. [12725927] (BJK) [Entered: 05/31/2023 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) Benjamin G. Shatz for party(s) Appellant Philip Brumley, in case 23-35329. [12725919] (BJK) [Entered: 05/31/2023 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Benjamin E. Strauss (Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 1700, Los Angeles, CA 90067) for Appellant Philip Brumley. Date of service: 05/31/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12725788] [23-35329] (Strauss, Benjamin) [Entered: 05/31/2023 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Benjamin G. Shatz (Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 1700, Los Angeles, CA 90067) for Appellant Philip Brumley. Date of service: 05/31/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12725753] [23-35329] (Shatz, Benjamin) [Entered: 05/31/2023 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellees Tracy Caekaert and Camillia Mapley Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, Motion for sanctions. Date of service: 05/26/2023. [12723472] [23-35329] (Shaffer, Ryan) [Entered: 05/26/2023 12:59 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/17/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12717640]. [23-35329] (AD) [Entered: 05/17/2023 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Philip Brumley Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/17/2023. [12717628] [23-35329] (Sweeney, Christopher) [Entered: 05/17/2023 12:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/17/2023. Transcript ordered by 06/07/2023. Transcript due 07/07/2023. Appellant Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society of Pennsylvania, Inc. opening brief due 08/16/2023. Appellees Tracy Caekaert and Camillia Mapley answering brief due 09/15/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12713454] (JBS) [Entered: 05/10/2023 04:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
