Raymond De Botton v. Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington, et al
| RAYMOND DE BOTTON |
| QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON, MCCARTHY & HOLTHUS, LLP, WARREN LANCE, FIRST HORIZON HOME LOAN CORPORATION, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. and STATE OF WASHINGTON |
| 23-35337 |
| May 15, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellant Raymond De Botton reply to response (). Date of service: 06/28/2023. [12745100] [23-35337] (Stafne, Scott) [Entered: 06/28/2023 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellee State of Washington response to motion ([ # 9 ] Party Motion). Date of service: 06/21/2023. [12740499] [23-35337] (Endres, Kelsey) [Entered: 06/21/2023 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellee Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. response to motion ([ # 9 ] Party Motion). Date of service: 06/21/2023. [12740430] [23-35337] (Sagara, Midori) [Entered: 06/21/2023 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Appellants motion to extend the time for compliance with the courts June 2, 2023 order to show cause (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) is granted. Appellant shall have until July 23, 2023 to comply with the order to show cause. Appellants motion for injunctive relief will be addressed upon resolution of the order to show cause. Appellees response to the motion for injunctive relief remains due June 21, 2023. [12738099] (AF) [Entered: 06/16/2023 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Raymond De Botton motion restrain. Deficiencies: None. [12735832] (JFF) [Entered: 06/14/2023 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Raymond De Botton Motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 06/02/2023. Date of service: 06/11/2023. [12733264] [23-35337] (Stafne, Scott) [Entered: 06/11/2023 05:24 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (A district court order is . . . not appealable [under 1291] unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). (citation omitted)); Est. of Bishop v. Bechtel Power Corp., 905 F.2d 1272, 1274 (9th Cir. 1990) ([T]he denial of a motion to remand is not a final order appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291.); see also Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (noting that the denial of reconsideration of a non-appealable order is itself not appealable). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall either move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12727772] (WL) [Entered: 06/02/2023 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Kelsey Endres for party(s) Appellee State of Washington, in case 23-35337. [12719982] (BJK) [Entered: 05/22/2023 11:10 AM] |
| Filing 5 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court.,filed 5/18/23. [12719166] (BJK) [Entered: 05/19/2023 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kelsey E. Endres (Washington Office of the Attorney General, 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98104-3188) for Appellee State of Washington. Date of service: 05/19/2023. (Party was previously proceeding pro se.) [12719163] [23-35337] (Endres, Kelsey) [Entered: 05/19/2023 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/18/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12718887]. [23-35337] (AD) [Entered: 05/18/2023 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Raymond De Botton Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/18/2023. [12718505] [23-35337] (Stafne, Scott) [Entered: 05/18/2023 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Raymond De Botton Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/22/2023. Appellant Raymond De Botton opening brief due 07/12/2023. Appellees First Horizon Home Loan Corporation, Warren Lance, McCarthy & Holthus, LLP, Quality Loan Service Corporation of Washington, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and State of Washington answering brief due 08/11/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12716062] (JBS) [Entered: 05/15/2023 03:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
