Tracey Godfrey v. Leroy Kirkegard, et al
TRACEY GODFREY |
LEROY KIRKEGARD, TIMOTHY C. FOX and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA |
23-35398 |
June 9, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 Sent Appellant a copy of DE numbers 1-15 in response to the letter of request filed on 08/03/2023. [12767719] (JR) [Entered: 08/03/2023 03:27 PM] |
Filing 16 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey letter dated 07/28/2023 re: Request for copy of documents. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12767685] (QDL) [Entered: 08/03/2023 02:44 PM] |
Filing 15 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey letter dated 07/29/2023 re: Jurisdiction. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12767677] (QDL) [Entered: 08/03/2023 02:39 PM] |
Filing 14 Filed order (RICHARD C. TALLMAN, N. RANDY SMITH and DANIEL P. COLLINS): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal, dated June 1, 2023, and filed on June 6, 2023, was not filed or delivered to prison officials within 30 days after the district courts order and judgment entered on March 26, 2019. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12763023] (AF) [Entered: 07/26/2023 04:56 PM] |
Filing 13 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey letter dated 07/19/2023 re: Showing of Unauthorized Sentence. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12762053] (BJK) [Entered: 07/25/2023 04:17 PM] |
Filing 11 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/13/2023. [12757587] (BJK) [Entered: 07/18/2023 04:35 PM] |
Filing 12 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey letter dated 07/07/2023 re: Demand to comply with the law. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12758833] (BJK) [Entered: 07/20/2023 12:55 PM] |
Filing 10 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/29/2023. [12749889] (BJK) [Entered: 07/06/2023 01:46 PM] |
Filing 9 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/27/2023. [12749850] (BJK) [Entered: 07/06/2023 01:19 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/27/2023. [12749847] (BJK) [Entered: 07/06/2023 01:18 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion for mandatory sua sponte action. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/23/2023. [12748026] (BJK) [Entered: 07/03/2023 01:13 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion for equal protection of the law. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/17/2023. [12743666] (BJK) [Entered: 06/27/2023 10:20 AM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion for dismissal. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/13/2023. [12743661] (BJK) [Entered: 06/27/2023 10:15 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion for dismissal. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/08/2023. [12737699] (RL) [Entered: 06/16/2023 10:49 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey motion for dismissal. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/09/2023. [12737974] (RL) [Entered: 06/16/2023 01:43 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Tracey Godfrey letter dated 06/08/2023 re: Questions and statements concerning case. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12733602] (RL) [Entered: 06/12/2023 11:16 AM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 03/26/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12732372] (RT) [Entered: 06/09/2023 09:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.