Preston Martin-Richardson v. King County Correctional Facility, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: PRESTON EUGENE MARTIN-RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee: KING COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN/JANE DOE, Warden, King County Correctional Facility, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-20, Director of Operations/Management, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-20, Correctional Employees, King County Correctional Facility, JOHN DIAZ, Director, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, HIKARI TAMURA, Deputy Director, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, CLARKE, Shift Commander, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, JOHN/JANE DOES, Policy and Procedures Sergeants or Correctional Officers, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, BATCHILLY, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, VASQUEZ, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, HURT, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, ANDERSON, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention and JEFFRIES, Sergeant, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention
Case Number: 23-35402
Filed: June 12, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 24, 2023 Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, RDN and PJB) [12759993] (NAC) [Entered: 07/24/2023 09:05 AM]
June 30, 2023 Filing 2 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, RYAN D. NELSON and PATRICK J. BUMATAY): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. To date, appellant has not filed a notice of appeal from the final judgment entered in the district court on June 16, 2023. DISMISSED. [12747194] (AF) [Entered: 06/30/2023 04:36 PM]
June 12, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Preston Eugene Martin-Richardson opening brief due 08/07/2023. Appellees Anderson, Batchilly, Clarke, John Diaz, Hurt, Jeffries, John/Jane Doe, John/Jane Does, John/Jane Does 1-20, King County Correctional Facility, Hikari Tamura and Vasquez answering brief due 09/05/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12733612] (ABT) [Entered: 06/12/2023 11:20 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Preston Martin-Richardson v. King County Correctional Facility, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: PRESTON EUGENE MARTIN-RICHARDSON
Represented By: Preston Eugene Martin-Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KING COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN/JANE DOE, Warden, King County Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN/JANE DOES 1-20, Director of Operations/Management
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN/JANE DOES 1-20, Correctional Employees, King County Correctional Facility
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN DIAZ, Director, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HIKARI TAMURA, Deputy Director, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CLARKE, Shift Commander, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN/JANE DOES, Policy and Procedures Sergeants or Correctional Officers, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BATCHILLY, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: VASQUEZ, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HURT, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ANDERSON, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JEFFRIES, Sergeant, King County Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention
Represented By: Dana Tumenova
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?