Ronald Strasser, Jr. v. State of Oregon, et al
| RONALD KENNETH STRASSER, Jr. |
| STATE OF OREGON, by and through Governor Kate Brown, in her individual capacity, KATE BROWN, in her individual capacity, SHELLEY HOFFMAN, State Risk Manager, ERIC MACHADO, Clackamas County Risk and Safety Manager, CRAIG ROBERTS, Clackamas County Sheriff, in his individual capacity, DAVE M. ELLINGTON, Clackamas County Under Sheriff, in his individual capacity, DANIEL JOSEPH O'KEEFE, Clackamas County Sheriff Deputy, in his private capacity, GREG KEPPLER, Clackamas County Sheriff Deputy, in his private capacity, KATY COBA, Department of Administrative Services, DEBBIE SPRADLEY, Trial Court Administrator, JOHN S. FOOTE, Clackamas County District Attorney, CHRISTOPHER K. HAYWOOD, Assistant D.A., DONALD KRUPP, County Administrator, LAUREL BUTMAN, Chief Executive Officer Deputy, KEN HUMBERSTON, Commissioner, MORGAN GUTHNER, Clackamas County Sheriff Deputy, in his private capacity, DAVID O'SHAUGHNESSY, Captain, in their private capacity, COREY R. SMITH, Sergeant, in their private capacity, ROBERT HERNDON, Clackamas County Circuit Court Officer, Judge, JEFFREY S. JONES, Clackamas County Circuit Court Officer, Judge, THOMAS J. RASTETTER, Clackamas County Circuit Court Officer, Judge, OREGON STATE SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION, PAT GARRETT, Sheriff; 2017 OSSA President & Washington County Sheriff, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY SYSTEMS AND TRAINING, DPI SECURITY, FKA DePaul Security Service, JOEL MANLEY, SAMANTHA OLSON, CLACKAMAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE PROFESSIONAL STANDARD UNIT, KEN BOELL, Lieutenant, SHANE STRANGFIELD, Captain, DAN SMITH, Detective, ALL CLERKS OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY COURT AND THEIR ASSOCIATES, ALL OTHER DEPUTY'S DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY INVOLVED and JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-100 |
| 23-35422 |
| June 22, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ronald Kenneth Strasser, Jr. Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Form 4). Date of service: 08/16/2023. [12775706] [23-35422] (Strasser, Ronald) [Entered: 08/16/2023 06:06 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ronald Kenneth Strasser, Jr. response to Court order dated 07/12/2023. Date of service: 08/16/2023. [12775037] [23-35422] (Strasser, Ronald) [Entered: 08/16/2023 09:38 AM] |
| Filing 5 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court, filed 07/24/2023. [12761468] (HH) [Entered: 07/25/2023 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is frivolous and not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12753749] (CKP) [Entered: 07/12/2023 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 06/27/2023: The Court certifies that the appeal is frivolous for purposes of 1915 and thus is not taken in good faith as that term is used in 1915(a)(3). The Court, therefore, revokes Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status. [12743945] (HH) [Entered: 06/27/2023 01:33 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk: MCD: Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12743010] (CKP) [Entered: 06/26/2023 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ronald Kenneth Strasser Jr. opening brief due 08/24/2023. Appellees All Clerks of Clackamas County Court and their associates, All other deputy's directly and indirectly involved, Ken Boell, Kate Brown, Laurel Butman, Clackamas County Sheriff's Office Professional Standard Unit, Katy Coba, DPI Security, Department of Public Safety Systems and Training, Dave M. Ellington, John S. Foote, Pat Garrett, Morgan Guthner, Christopher K. Haywood, Robert Herndon, Shelley Hoffman, Ken Humberston, John And Jane Does, Jeffrey S. Jones, Greg Keppler, Donald Krupp, Eric Machado, Joel Manley, Daniel Joseph O'Keefe, David O'Shaughnessy, Samantha Olson, Oregon State Sheriff's Association, Thomas J. Rastetter, Craig Roberts, Corey R. Smith, Dan Smith, Debbie Spradley, State of Oregon and Shane Strangfield answering brief due 09/25/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12741226] (RT) [Entered: 06/22/2023 01:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
