Daniel Serrano v. Russell Sanders, et al
Defendant: STATE OF WASHINGTON and WASHINGTON STATE PATROL
Plaintiff / Appellee: DANIEL SERRANO, a single person
Defendant / Appellant: TROOPER RUSSELL LEE SANDERS, TROOPER TOM SHIRLEY and SERGEANT MICHAEL FAULK
Case Number: 23-35437
Filed: June 27, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 16, 2024 DANIEL SERRANO V. RUSSELL SANDERS, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2023 Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The conference previously scheduled for September 01, 2023, is canceled. This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [12774819] (VS) [Entered: 08/15/2023 04:28 PM]
August 14, 2023 Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 09/01/2023, 12:00 p.m., Pacific Time. See order for details. [12773378] (VS) [Entered: 08/14/2023 11:25 AM]
July 24, 2023 Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 08/14/2023, 11:00 a.m., Pacific Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: Appellants Michael Faulk, Russell Lee Sanders and Tom Shirley opening brief due 10/04/2023. Appellee Daniel Serrano answering brief due 11/03/2023. Appellants optional reply brief is due within 21 days afer service of the answering brief. See order for details. [12760396] (VS) [Entered: 07/24/2023 12:55 PM]
July 10, 2023 Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 07/24/2023, 12:00 p.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 07/21/2023 ). [12751750] (VS) [Entered: 07/10/2023 12:51 PM]
June 30, 2023 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 07/21/2023, 10:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12746622] (VS) [Entered: 06/30/2023 11:46 AM]
June 29, 2023 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/29/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12746252]. [23-35437] (AD) [Entered: 06/29/2023 06:44 PM]
June 29, 2023 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Michael Faulk, Russell Lee Sanders and Tom Shirley Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/29/2023. [12745942] [23-35437] (Force, David) [Entered: 06/29/2023 02:19 PM]
June 27, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Michael Faulk, Russell Lee Sanders and Tom Shirley Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/05/2023. Appellants Michael Faulk, Russell Lee Sanders and Tom Shirley opening brief due 08/25/2023. Appellee Daniel Serrano answering brief due 09/25/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12743697] (JBS) [Entered: 06/27/2023 10:41 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Daniel Serrano v. Russell Sanders, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: DANIEL SERRANO, a single person
Represented By: Douglas Dwight Phelps
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: TROOPER RUSSELL LEE SANDERS
Represented By: David L. Force
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: TROOPER TOM SHIRLEY
Represented By: David L. Force
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: SERGEANT MICHAEL FAULK
Represented By: David L. Force
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WASHINGTON STATE PATROL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?