Edward Steiner v. Brent Kempster, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: EDWARD J. STEINER
Defendant / Appellee: BRENT KEMPSTER, Officer, La Push Police Department, NICOLE WHEELER, Cashier, Lonesome Creek Store and Resort and APRIL BLAIR-PULLEN, Cashier, Lonesome Creek Store and Resort
Appellee: QUILEUTE TRIBE
Case Number: 23-35445
Filed: June 29, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2023 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellee Brent Kempster response to motion ([ # 8 ] Party Motion). Date of service: 08/17/2023. [12776369] [23-35445] (Villagomez, Chloe) [Entered: 08/17/2023 03:38 PM]
August 8, 2023 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Edward J. Steiner motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/27/2023. [12770545] (BJK) [Entered: 08/08/2023 02:23 PM]
August 7, 2023 Filing 9 Filed Appellant Edward J. Steiner statement dated 07/28/2023 that appeal should go forward. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12770551] (BJK) [Entered: 08/08/2023 02:25 PM]
July 27, 2023 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Edward J. Steiner motion to save all video, property, clothing, pictures and booking sheet from Clallam Cty. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/22/2023. [12764484] (BJK) [Entered: 07/28/2023 03:41 PM]
July 27, 2023 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Edward J. Steiner motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/07/2023. [12764477] (BJK) [Entered: 07/28/2023 03:37 PM]
July 27, 2023 Filing 5 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Edward J. Steiner opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 07/22/2023. Major deficiency: briefing is stayed. [12763577] (KWG) [Entered: 07/27/2023 01:17 PM]
July 19, 2023 Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is frivolous and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12757859] (CKP) [Entered: 07/19/2023 10:22 AM]
July 17, 2023 Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 07/17/2023 revoking in forma pauperis status. [12756621] (BJK) [Entered: 07/17/2023 04:09 PM]
July 13, 2023 Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk: MCD: Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12754524] (CKP) [Entered: 07/13/2023 11:08 AM]
June 29, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Edward J. Steiner opening brief due 08/29/2023. Appellees April Blair-Pullen, Brent Kempster, Quileute Tribe and Nicole Wheeler answering brief due 09/29/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12746089] (RT) [Entered: 06/29/2023 03:47 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Edward Steiner v. Brent Kempster, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: EDWARD J. STEINER
Represented By: Edward J. Steiner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BRENT KEMPSTER, Officer, La Push Police Department
Represented By: Chloe Thompson Villagomez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NICOLE WHEELER, Cashier, Lonesome Creek Store and Resort
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: APRIL BLAIR-PULLEN, Cashier, Lonesome Creek Store and Resort
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: QUILEUTE TRIBE
Represented By: Chloe Thompson Villagomez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?