United States of America v. Hester
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| KEVIN DWAYNE HESTER |
| 23-3547 |
| November 16, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel filed by Samuel C. Kauffman for Appellant Kevin Dwayne Hester. [Entered: 11/24/2023 03:25 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER FILED. Court records show that counsel Samuel C. Kauffman was appointed under the Criminal Justice Act to represent appellant before the district court and has not been granted leave to withdraw. Counsel has a duty to continue to represent appellant on appeal until counsel is relieved by this court. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(a). Therefore, although appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal, counsel Kauffman remains responsible for prosecuting this appeal and has been entered on the docket as counsel of record. If counsel wishes to withdraw, within 21 days of this order, he must file in this court a motion to withdraw that complies with the requirements of Ninth Circuit Rule 4-1(c). If counsel does not move to withdraw, the existing briefing schedule will remain in effect. The Clerk will serve this order on counsel Kauffman and appellant individually. [Entered: 11/17/2023 11:02 AM]
|
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: 110 MONTHS. Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) due 11/29/2023, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) due 12/29/2023, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) due 2/7/2024, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) due 3/8/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 11/16/2023 11:17 AM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:20-cr-00268-MO-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-3547 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/16/2023 10:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Hester | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Thomas H. Edmonds |
| Represented By: | Suzanne Miles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: KEVIN DWAYNE HESTER | |
| Represented By: | Samuel C. Kauffman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
