USA v. Brandon Bennett
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: BRANDON CORDELL BENNETT
Case Number: 23-35475
Filed: July 14, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Vacate Sentence
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2023 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Brandon Cordell Bennett motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. [12759724] (QDL) [Entered: 07/21/2023 03:02 PM]
July 14, 2023 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 06/21/2023. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12755663] (OC) [Entered: 07/14/2023 03:20 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Brandon Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Cyndee L. Peterson
Represented By: Ryan George Weldon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: BRANDON CORDELL BENNETT
Represented By: Brandon Cordell Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?