Kenneth Leaming v. Krishnan Srinivasan, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING
Defendant / Appellee: KRISHNAN SRINIVASAN, AKA Krish, SUZANNE MONFORD, JAI SAN MIGUEL and UNKNOWN PARTIES, All (90,000) Unknown Owners and Board Members, DBA PCC Community Markets
Case Number: 23-35487
Filed: July 20, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2023 Filing 12 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 11 ]. Original Text: Submitted (ECF) Supplemental Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Kenneth Wayne Leaming. Date of service: 08/15/2023. [12774607] [23-35487] (Leaming, Kenneth) [Entered: 08/15/2023 02:07 PM]
August 11, 2023 Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellees Jai San Miguel, Suzanne Monford, Krishnan Srinivasan and Unknown Parties reply to response to court order dated 07/28/2023. Date of service: 08/11/2023. [12773063] [23-35487]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 08/15/2023 by SLM]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached supplemental memorandum to resposne. 08/17/2023 by SLM] (Feider, Darren) [Entered: 08/11/2023 07:20 PM]
August 2, 2023 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kenneth Wayne Leaming Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Date of service: 08/02/2023. [12767260]--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [9].] (SLM) [Entered: 08/03/2023 09:39 AM]
August 2, 2023 Filing 9 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 10 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Kenneth Wayne Leaming financial affidavit in support or request for attorney, expert, or other court services without payment of fee (CJA Form 23). Date of service: 08/02/2023. [12767086] [23-35487] (Leaming, Kenneth) [Entered: 08/02/2023 05:35 PM]
August 1, 2023 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kenneth Wayne Leaming response to court order dated 07/28/2023. Date of service: 08/01/2023. [12765889] [23-35487]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 08/02/2023 by SLM] (Leaming, Kenneth) [Entered: 08/01/2023 12:27 PM]
July 28, 2023 Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. . [12764254] (CKP) [Entered: 07/28/2023 12:27 PM]
July 26, 2023 Filing 6 Received copy of District Court order filed on 07/25/2023 revoking in forma pauperis status. [12763243] (BJK) [Entered: 07/27/2023 09:41 AM]
July 26, 2023 Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) Darren A. Feider for party(s) Appellees Krishnan Srinivasan, Jai San Miguel, Unknown Parties and Suzanne Monford, in case 23-35487. [12763012] (BJK) [Entered: 07/26/2023 04:48 PM]
July 26, 2023 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Darren Anthony Feider (Sebris Busto James 15375 SE 30th Pl., Suite 310 Bellevue, Washington 98007) for Appellees Jai San Miguel, Suzanne Monford, Krishnan Srinivasan and Unknown Parties. Date of service: 07/26/2023. (Party was previously proceeding pro se.) [12762528] [23-35487] (Feider, Darren) [Entered: 07/26/2023 11:41 AM]
July 21, 2023 Filing 3 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk: MCD: Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12759482] (CKP) [Entered: 07/21/2023 11:39 AM]
July 20, 2023 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kenneth Wayne Leaming Correspondence: Notice of mailing address. Date of service: 07/20/2023. [12759196] [23-35487] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 07/21/2023 by TYL] (Leaming, Kenneth) [Entered: 07/20/2023 07:51 PM]
July 20, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES.. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kenneth Wayne Leaming opening brief due 09/18/2023. [12758944] (JMR) [Entered: 07/20/2023 02:26 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kenneth Leaming v. Krishnan Srinivasan, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: KENNETH WAYNE LEAMING
Represented By: Kenneth Wayne Leaming
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KRISHNAN SRINIVASAN, AKA Krish
Represented By: Darren A. Feider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SUZANNE MONFORD
Represented By: Darren A. Feider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JAI SAN MIGUEL
Represented By: Darren A. Feider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNKNOWN PARTIES, All (90,000) Unknown Owners and Board Members, DBA PCC Community Markets
Represented By: Darren A. Feider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?