James Goodwin, III v. USA
JAMES CLIFFORD GOODWIN III |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
23-35492 |
July 20, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Filed Appellant James Clifford Goodwin, III motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/02/2023. [12773470] (BJK) [Entered: 08/14/2023 12:20 PM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 05/09/2022. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12759167] (OC) [Entered: 07/20/2023 05:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: James Goodwin, III v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: JAMES CLIFFORD GOODWIN III | |
Represented By: | James Clifford Goodwin III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | John Christopher Shirts |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.