Roland Ma
In re: ROLAND MA |
ROLAND MA |
23-35500 |
July 24, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 08/08/2023. [12770854] (RT) [Entered: 08/08/2023 06:43 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Order to show cause docket fee due [12765614] (CKP) [Entered: 08/01/2023 09:20 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Roland Ma opening brief due 09/25/2023. [12760615] (RT) [Entered: 07/24/2023 02:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Roland Ma | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Not classified by court: In re: ROLAND MA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: ROLAND MA | |
Represented By: | Roland Ma |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.