BNSF Railway Company, et al v. Center for Asbestos Related Disease, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit BNSF Railway Company, et al v. Center for Asbestos Related Disease, Inc.

BNSF Railway Company, et al v. Center for Asbestos Related Disease, Inc.

Plaintiff / Appellee:	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Relator and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:	CENTER FOR ASBESTOS RELATED DISEASE, INC.
Case Number:	23-35507
Filed:	July 26, 2023
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Qui Tam False Claims Act

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
July 26, 2023	Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Center for Asbestos Related Disease, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/02/2023. Transcript ordered by 08/24/2023. Transcript due 09/22/2023. Appellant Center for Asbestos Related Disease, Inc. opening brief due 10/30/2023. Appellees BNSF Railway Company and United States of America answering brief due 11/30/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12762670] (RT) [Entered: 07/26/2023 01:12 PM]

Date Filed

Document Text

July 26, 2023

Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Center for Asbestos Related Disease, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/02/2023. Transcript ordered by 08/24/2023. Transcript due 09/22/2023. Appellant Center for Asbestos Related Disease, Inc. opening brief due 10/30/2023. Appellees BNSF Railway Company and United States of America answering brief due 11/30/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12762670] (RT) [Entered: 07/26/2023 01:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: BNSF Railway Company, et al v. Center for Asbestos Related Disease, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, Relator
Represented By:	Chad Knight
Represented By:	Seamus M. Molloy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By:	Michael A. Kakuk
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CENTER FOR ASBESTOS RELATED DISEASE, INC.
Represented By:	Timothy M. Bechtold Esquire
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?