Michael Jackman v. City of Pocatello, et al
| MICHAEL A. JACKMAN |
| CITY OF POCATELLO, ROGER SCHEI, KEVIN NIELSEN and JOHN DOES, I-X |
| 23-35546 |
| August 18, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Terminated Jason Wood for Michael A. Jackman in 23-35546 [12795202] (AF) [Entered: 09/19/2023 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The renewed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ]) of Jason Wood to withdraw as counsel for appellant is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect that appellant is proceeding pro se. The opening brief is now due October 20, 2023. The answering brief is due November 20, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The Clerk will provide a copy of the pro se case opening packet along with this order to appellant at: Michael A. Jackman 63 Chestnut Ln. Pocatello, ID 83201 [12795197] (AF) [Entered: 09/19/2023 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Michael A. Jackman Renewed motion. Attorney(s) Attorney Mr. Jason Wood for Appellant Michael A. Jackman motion to withdraw as counsel. Date of service: 09/12/2023. [12791184] [23-35546] (Wood, Jason) [Entered: 09/12/2023 11:20 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) of Jason Wood to withdraw as counsel for appellant is denied without prejudice to a renewed motion that provides appellants address. The opening brief remains due October 16, 2023. The answering brief is due November 15, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12790480] (OC) [Entered: 09/12/2023 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/06/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12787805]. [23-35546] (AD) [Entered: 09/06/2023 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Michael A. Jackman motion. Attorney(s) Attorney Mr. Jason Wood for Appellant Michael A. Jackman motion to withdraw as counsel. Date of service: 09/06/2023. [12787786] [23-35546] (Wood, Jason) [Entered: 09/06/2023 05:35 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Michael A. Jackman Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/06/2023. [12787733] [23-35546] (Wood, Jason) [Entered: 09/06/2023 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within five (5) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12786797] (BLS) [Entered: 09/05/2023 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Michael A. Jackman Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/25/2023. Appellant Michael A. Jackman opening brief due 10/16/2023. Appellees City of Pocatello, John Does, Kevin Nielsen and Roger Schei answering brief due 11/15/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12776727] (JMR) [Entered: 08/18/2023 10:04 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
