Nathanial Hasher v. City of Rochester, et al
| NATHANIAL JAMES HASHER |
| CITY OF ROCHESTER, a Minnesota municipal entity, E. FRITZ, Officer, Badge No. 187, personally, individually, and in his capacity as a Rochester Police Officer, FAUDSKAR, Officer, personally, individually, and in his capacity as a Rochester Police, RICHARD ROE, Officers, unknown and unnamed Rochester Police officers, personally, individaully, and in their capacities as Rochester Police officers, ROGER L. PETERSON, Chief of Police, personally, individually, and in his official capacity and JANE DOE, unknown and unnamed Rochester Police officers, personally, individually, and in their capacities as Rochester Police officers |
| 23-35576 |
| August 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Nathanial James Hasher letter re: Requesting special consideration. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12805632] (QDL) [Entered: 10/05/2023 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (BRIDGET S. BADE, KENNETH K. LEE and LAWRENCE VANDYKE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because August 29, 2023 notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after the district court courts judgment entered on July 12, 2023. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United Sta tes v. Sadler , 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12799739] (JMR) [Entered: 09/27/2023 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Nathanial James Hasher letter re: Copy of district court docket, notice of appeal and representation statement. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12794322] (QDL) [Entered: 09/18/2023 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Nathanial James Hasher opening brief due 11/06/2023. [12784692] (RT) [Entered: 08/31/2023 02:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Nathanial Hasher v. City of Rochester, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: NATHANIAL JAMES HASHER | |
| Represented By: | Nathanial James Hasher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CITY OF ROCHESTER, a Minnesota municipal entity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: E. FRITZ, Officer, Badge No. 187, personally, individually, and in his capacity as a Rochester Police Officer | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: FAUDSKAR, Officer, personally, individually, and in his capacity as a Rochester Police | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: RICHARD ROE, Officers, unknown and unnamed Rochester Police officers, personally, individaully, and in their capacities as Rochester Police officers | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: ROGER L. PETERSON, Chief of Police, personally, individually, and in his official capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: JANE DOE, unknown and unnamed Rochester Police officers, personally, individually, and in their capacities as Rochester Police officers | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
