Saddle Mountain Minerals, LLC v. City of Richland
| SADDLE MOUNTAIN MINERALS, LLC |
| CITY OF RICHLAND, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington |
| 23-35622 |
| September 29, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12826012] (CL) [Entered: 11/17/2023 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 11/16/2023, 2:30 p.m., Pacific Time. See order for details. [12821601] (VS) [Entered: 11/08/2023 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 11/08/2023, 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [12817902] (CL) [Entered: 10/31/2023 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 10/31/2023, 1:30 p.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12807430] (VS) [Entered: 10/10/2023 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/06/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12806156]. [23-35622] (AD) [Entered: 10/06/2023 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Saddle Mountain Minerals, LLC Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/06/2023. [12806037] [23-35622] (Stephens, Richard) [Entered: 10/06/2023 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Saddle Mountain Minerals, LLC Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/06/2023. Transcript ordered by 10/30/2023. Transcript due 11/27/2023. Appellant Saddle Mountain Minerals, LLC opening brief due 01/08/2024. Appellee City of Richland answering brief due 02/07/2024. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12801587] (JBS) [Entered: 09/29/2023 02:21 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Saddle Mountain Minerals, LLC v. City of Richland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: SADDLE MOUNTAIN MINERALS, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Charles Andrew Klinge |
| Represented By: | Richard M. Stephens |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CITY OF RICHLAND, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington | |
| Represented By: | Kenneth W. Harper |
| Represented By: | Quinn N. Plant |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
