Esteban Lopez v. Garland
Petitioner: ADRIAN ESTEBAN LOPEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 23-358
Filed: March 9, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 26, 2024 ESTEBAN LOPEZ V. GARLAND

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2023 Filing 37 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco. Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for February 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 10/06/2023 05:02 PM]
September 26, 2023 Filing 36 Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 32 by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez received. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 09/26/2023 01:49 PM]
September 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER FILED. Reply Brief submitted at DE 32 by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 09/21/2023 02:14 PM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 34 CERTIFICATION for Law Student Representation Form filed by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez. [23-855, 23-358] [Entered: 09/21/2023 08:16 AM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 33 DEFECTIVE --- REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez. [23-855, 23-358]--[Duplicate entry] [Entered: 09/21/2023 08:20 AM] [Edited: 09/21/2023 02:08 PM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 32 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 09/21/2023 08:19 AM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 31 CERTIFICATION for Law Student Representation Form filed by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 09/21/2023 08:12 AM]
September 19, 2023 Filing 30 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for January 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 09/19/2023 11:42 AM]
September 13, 2023 Filing 29 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 26 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 09/13/2023 02:59 PM]
September 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 26 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 09/01/2023 11:45 AM]
August 31, 2023 Filing 27 DEFECTIVE --- ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [23-855, 23-358]--[COURT UPDATE: Duplicate entry] [Entered: 08/31/2023 01:26 PM] [Edited: 09/01/2023 11:40 AM]
August 31, 2023 Filing 26 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 08/31/2023 01:27 PM]
August 1, 2023 Filing 25 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Sheri Robyn Glaser for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/01/2023 12:14 PM]
August 1, 2023 Filing 24 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sheri Robyn Glaser for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [23-855, 23-358] [Entered: 08/01/2023 12:03 PM]
August 1, 2023 Filing 23 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Sheri Robyn Glaser for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 08/01/2023 12:01 PM]
July 13, 2023 Filing 22 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted in 23-358 at DE 18 by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez received. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 07/13/2023 01:51 PM]
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted in 23-358 at DE 18 by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 07/07/2023 03:16 PM]
July 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER FILED. The motions for summary disposition (Docket Entry No. 14 in No. 23-358 and Docket Entry No. 15 in No. 23-855) are denied because the questions raised by these petitions are sufficient to warrant full briefing. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(a) (standard for summary disposition); see also United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982). The motion for appointment of pro bono counsel in petition No. 23-358 (Docket Entry No. 4 in No. 23-358) is denied as moot because counsel has appeared for petitioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis in petition No. 23-855 (Docket Entry No. 3 in No. 23-855) is granted. The motion to consolidate petition Nos. 23-358 and No. 23-855 (Docket Entry No. 17 in No. 23-358 and Docket Entry No. 6 in No. 23-855) is granted. The parties must include both case numbers on all future filings. The Clerk will file the consolidated opening brief submitted at Docket Entry No. 18 in petition No. 23-358. The consolidated opening brief has been filed in petition No. 23-855. The consolidated answering brief is due September 5, 2023. The optional consolidated reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the consolidated answering brief. [23-358, 23-855] [Entered: 07/07/2023 02:51 PM]
June 15, 2023 Filing 19 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 18 by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez received. [Entered: 06/15/2023 11:22 AM]
June 12, 2023 Filing 18 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez. [Entered: 06/12/2023 07:15 AM]
May 5, 2023 Filing 17 MOTION to consolidate filed by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez. [Entered: 05/05/2023 12:07 PM]
May 5, 2023 Filing 16 REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez. [Entered: 05/05/2023 11:52 AM]
May 5, 2023 Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion for Summary Disposition (DE 14) filed by Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez. [Entered: 05/05/2023 11:50 AM]
May 4, 2023 Filing 14 MOTION for summary disposition filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE13.] [Entered: 05/04/2023 02:29 PM] [Edited: 05/04/2023 02:33 PM]
May 4, 2023 Filing 13 OPPOSITION to motion to stay removal filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [COURT UPDATE: Refiled motion at DE 14.] [Entered: 05/04/2023 02:09 PM] [Edited: 05/04/2023 02:30 PM]
April 28, 2023 Filing 12 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Thomas Vernon Burch for Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez. [Entered: 04/28/2023 09:45 AM]
April 28, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Thomas Vernon Burch for Petitioner Adrian Esteban Lopez. [Entered: 04/28/2023 09:34 AM]
March 15, 2023 Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 03/15/2023 05:06 AM]
March 13, 2023 Filing 9 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Andrew B. Insenga for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/13/2023 11:20 AM]
March 13, 2023 Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Andrew B. Insenga for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/13/2023 11:12 AM]
March 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 3) is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The certified administrative record remains due April 13, 2023. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due May 4, 2023. Briefing is stayed pending resolution of the motion for appointment of counsel. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [Entered: 03/10/2023 04:23 PM]
March 9, 2023 Filing 6 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 4/13/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 5/4/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 6/12/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 8/11/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/09/2023 03:01 PM]
March 9, 2023 Filing 5 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 3/9/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-358 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/09/2023 02:57 PM]
March 9, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/09/2023 02:56 PM]
March 9, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/09/2023 02:56 PM]
March 9, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 03/09/2023 02:56 PM]
March 9, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/09/2023 02:56 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Esteban Lopez v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ADRIAN ESTEBAN LOPEZ
Represented By: Thomas Vernon Burch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Ms. Sheri Robyn Glaser
Represented By: Oil
Represented By: Mr. Andrew B. Insenga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?