National Labor Relations Board v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Respondent: UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, INC
Case Number: 23-3628
Filed: November 20, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2023 Filing 10 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. The court has scheduled a dial-in telephone assessment conference with counsel on the date and time indicated above. Each participant on the attached list will receive an email with dial-in information. If there are any changes or additions to the list, please notify the Mediation Office at mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov. Also, please notify Circuit Mediator Roxane Ashe immediately by email ( Roxane_Ashe@ca9.uscourts.gov) if counsel has an unavoidable scheduling conflict. Please copy all counsel on any such communications. All communications should include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. All discussions that take place in the context of the conference are confidential. See Cir. R. 33-1. For more detailed information about the assessment conference, confidentiality, the Mediation Program and its procedures generally, please see the attachment to this order and the Mediation Program web site: www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. The briefing schedule previously established by the court remains in effect. [Entered: 11/27/2023 02:42 PM]
November 22, 2023 Filing 9 MEDIATION QUESTIONNAIRE filed by Petitioner National Labor Relations Board. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please email #ca09_mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov and include the case name and number in the subject line. Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts. [Entered: 11/22/2023 07:14 AM]
November 21, 2023 Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Jared David Cantor for Petitioner National Labor Relations Board. [Entered: 11/21/2023 12:44 PM]
November 21, 2023 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Milakshmi V. Rajapakse for Petitioner National Labor Relations Board. [Entered: 11/21/2023 12:41 PM]
November 21, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jared David Cantor for Petitioner National Labor Relations Board. [Entered: 11/21/2023 11:39 AM]
November 21, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Milakshmi V. Rajapakse for Petitioner National Labor Relations Board. [Entered: 11/21/2023 11:36 AM]
November 21, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Ruth E. Burdick for Petitioner National Labor Relations Board. [Entered: 11/21/2023 11:33 AM]
November 20, 2023 Filing 3 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Petitioner) due 11/27/2023, Application For Enforcement Opening Brief due (Respondent) due 2/8/2024, Application For Enforcement Answering Brief due (Petitioner) due 3/11/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 11/20/2023 04:03 PM] [Edited: 11/21/2023 10:58 AM]
November 20, 2023 Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Application for Enforcement has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 11/20/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-3628 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/20/2023 04:00 PM]
November 20, 2023 Filing 1 APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT filed by Petitioner National Labor Relations Board. [Entered: 11/20/2023 04:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: National Labor Relations Board v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Represented By: Ruth E. Burdick
Represented By: Mr. Jared David Cantor
Represented By: Ms. Milakshmi V. Rajapakse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS, INC
Represented By: Darlene Haas Awada
Represented By: John T. Merrell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?