Jimenez Melo, et al. v. Garland
| DIEGO ALEJANDRO JIMENEZ MELO, YINNA PAOLA GOMEZ PERILLA, NICOL VALERIA CLAROS GOMEZ, SAMUEL ALEJANDRO JIMENEZ GOMEZ and SARA ALEJANDRA JIMENEZ GOMEZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 23-3823 |
| November 29, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Marie Vanderbilt Robinson [Entered: 11/30/2023 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Marie Vanderbilt Robinson for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/30/2023 01:20 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 2) is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The certified administrative record remains due January 8, 2024. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due January 29, 2024. The opening brief is due February 20, 2024. The answering brief is due March 21, 2024. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days of service of the answering brief. [Entered: 11/29/2023 02:11 PM]
|
| Filing 7 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) due 1/8/2024, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) due 1/29/2024, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) due 2/19/2024, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) due 3/18/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 11/29/2023 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 6 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 11/29/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-3823 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/29/2023 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 5 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 2/15/2023. [Entered: 11/29/2023 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 4 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 11/7/2023. [Entered: 11/29/2023 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 11/29/2023 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Diego Alejandro Jimenez Melo, Petitioner Yinna Paola Gomez Perilla, Petitioner Nicol Valeria Claros Gomez, Petitioner Samuel Alejandro Jimenez Gomez, Petitioner Sara Alejandra Jimenez Gomez. [Entered: 11/29/2023 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner Diego Alejandro Jimenez Melo, Petitioner Nicol Valeria Claros Gomez, Petitioner Samuel Alejandro Jimenez Gomez, Petitioner Sara Alejandra Jimenez Gomez, Petitioner Yinna Paola Gomez Perilla. [Entered: 11/29/2023 11:08 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
