Pachote, et al. v. Nelson, et al.

Pachote, et al. v. Nelson, et al.

Plaintiff:	K.R.J., a minor, by and through their guardian ad litem, Edward Johnson
Defendant:	COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a municipal corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee:	TRACY PACHOTE, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:	STEPHANIE NELSON, in her individual capacity as a sheriff deputy for the Contra Costa Sheriff Department and CHRISTOPHER THOMAS, in his individual capacity as a sheriff deputy for the Contra Costa Sheriff Department
Case Number:	23-4000
Filed:	December 7, 2023
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
December 7, 2023	Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) due 12/12/2023, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) due 1/16/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) due 2/15/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/07/2023 10:02 AM]
December 7, 2023	Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:21-cv-04097-SK has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-4000 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/07/2023 09:57 AM]

Date Filed

Document Text

December 7, 2023

Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) due 12/12/2023, Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) due 1/16/2024, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) due 2/15/2024. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 12/07/2023 10:02 AM]

December 7, 2023

Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:21-cv-04097-SK has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-4000 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/07/2023 09:57 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Pachote, et al. v. Nelson, et al.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: TRACY PACHOTE, an individual
Represented By:	Patrick M. Buelna
Represented By:	Adante D. Pointer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: K.R.J., a minor, by and through their guardian ad litem, Edward Johnson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: STEPHANIE NELSON, in her individual capacity as a sheriff deputy for the Contra Costa Sheriff Department
Represented By:	David Cameron Baker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CHRISTOPHER THOMAS, in his individual capacity as a sheriff deputy for the Contra Costa Sheriff Department
Represented By:	David Cameron Baker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, a municipal corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?