USA v. Steve Rodriguez
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| STEVE JACKSON RODRIGUEZ |
| 23-50024 |
| February 1, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The appellants unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 16 ]) for leave to file a late amended transcript designation order and to amend the briefing schedule is granted. The district court docket indicates that an amended transcript designation was filed on June 30, 2023. The transcripts are due July 31, 2023. The opening brief is due September 11, 2023. The answering brief is due October 11, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The Clerk will send a copy of this order to the court reporter at the district court. [12747237] (WL) [Entered: 06/30/2023 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 16 Filed (ECF) Appellant Steve Jackson Rodriguez Unopposed Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion for Leave to File Late Amended Transcript Designation and Order Forms, and to Modify Briefing Schedule]. Date of service: 06/29/2023. [12745682] [23-50024] (Farrand, Margaret) [Entered: 06/29/2023 11:08 AM] |
| Filing 15 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The appellants unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 14 ]) for a second extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due August 28, 2023. The answering brief is due September 27, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12741666] (AF) [Entered: 06/22/2023 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellant Steve Jackson Rodriguez Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 08/28/2023. Date of service: 06/22/2023. [12740868] [23-50024] (Farrand, Margaret) [Entered: 06/22/2023 09:32 AM] |
| Filing 13 Streamlined request [12] by Appellant Steve Jackson Rodriguez to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant briefs and excerpts due by 06/29/2023 for Steve Jackson Rodriguez. Appellee brief due 07/31/2023 for United States of America. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12719877] (BG) [Entered: 05/22/2023 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Steve Jackson Rodriguez. New requested due date is 06/29/2023. [12719858] [23-50024] (Farrand, Margaret) [Entered: 05/22/2023 09:20 AM] |
| Filing 11 Received appellant Steve Jackson Rodriguez pro se notice of change of address dated 04/23/2023 from. New address: USP, Tucson, P.O. Box 24550, Tucson, AZ 85734. [12704284] (HH) [Entered: 04/27/2023 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 10 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court, filed 4/20/2023. [12700207] (HH) [Entered: 04/21/2023 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 9 Attorney Brianna Fuller Mircheff substituted by Attorney Margaret A. Farrand in 23-50024. [12678799] (HH) [Entered: 03/21/2023 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Margaret Farrand (Office of the Federal Public Defender (321 E. 2nd Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012)) for Appellant Steve Jackson Rodriguez. Substitution for Attorney Ms. Brianna Fuller Mircheff for Appellant Steve Jackson Rodriguez. Date of service: 03/21/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12678794] [23-50024] (Farrand, Margaret) [Entered: 03/21/2023 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 7 Received email notice of counsel of record appointment. Attorney Brianna Fuller Mircheff for Appellant Steve Jackson Rodriguez, in case 23-50024. [12663489] (HH) [Entered: 02/28/2023 10:18 AM] |
| Filing 6 Terminated George Karl Rosenstock for Steve Jackson Rodriguez in 23-50024 [12653000] (WL) [Entered: 02/14/2023 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Appellants submission of a completed CJA Form 23 (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is treated as a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) for an extension of time to move for appointment of counsel is treated as a motion to relieve retained counsel George K. Rosenstock and appoint counsel and is granted. The Clerk will terminate counsel Rosenstock from the docket. The Clerk will electronically serve this order on the appointing authority for the Central District of California, who will locate appointed counsel. The appointing authority is requested to send notification of the name, address, and telephone number of appointed counsel to the Clerk of this court at counselappointments@ca9.uscourts.gov within 14 days of locating counsel. Appellant must designate the reporters transcript by March 20, 2023. The transcript is due April 19, 2023. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due May 30, 2023; the answering brief is due June 29, 2023; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The Clerk will also serve a CJA Form 24 on the appointing authority, who is requested to provide it to newly appointed counsel. See 28 U.S.C. 753(f). If appellant seeks transcripts of proceedings requiring special authorization, that authorization should be obtained from the district court. See 6 Guide to Judiciary Policy 550.40. The Clerk will serve this order on former counsel and appellant individually: Reg. No. 01053-506, Santa Ana Jail, 62 Civic Center Plaza, P.O. Box 22003, Santa Ana, CA 92701.[12652997] (WL) [Entered: 02/14/2023 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Steve Jackson Rodriguez pro se motion to extend to file motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: Appellant has counsel. Served on 02/08/2023. [12652308] (HH) [Entered: 02/13/2023 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Steve Jackson Rodriguez pro se motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: Appellant has counsel. Served on 02/08/2023. [12652305] (HH) [Entered: 02/13/2023 05:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KG): Court records show that counsel George K. Rosenstock was retained to represent appellant before the district court and has not been granted leave to withdraw. Counsel has a duty to continue to represent appellant on appeal until counsel is relieved by this court. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(a). Therefore, although appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal, counsel Rosenstock remains responsible for prosecuting this appeal and has been entered on the docket as counsel of record. If counsel wishes to withdraw, within 28 days of this order, he must file a motion in this court, which must be accompanied by one of the following: (1) a substitution of counsel showing that new counsel has been retained and has filed a notice of appearance, and paid to the district court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal; (2) a motion to appoint counsel, accompanied by a completed financial affidavit (CJA Form 23); (3) a statement expressing appellants clear and unequivocal request that the court exercise its discretion to permit appellant to proceed on appeal without the assistance of counsel, see 9th Cir. R. 4-1(d); Martinez v. Court of Appeal, 528 U.S. 152 (2000); or (4) an affidavit or signed statement from appellant showing that appellant has been advised of his rights with regard to the appeal and expressly stating that appellant wishes to dismiss the appeal voluntarily, see 9th Cir. R. 27-9.1. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(c). If counsel does not move to withdraw, within 28 days, the docketing and filing fees in the amount of $505.00 must be paid to the district court. The following briefing schedule will govern: Appellant must designate the reporters transcript by March 6, 2023. The transcript is due April 5, 2023. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due May 15, 2023; the answering brief is due June 14, 2023; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The Clerk will serve this order and a CJA Form 23 on counsel Rosenstock and on appellant individually: Reg. No. 01053-506, Santa Ana Jail, 62 Civic Center Plaza, P.O. Box 22003, Santa Ana, CA 92701. [12644693] (WL) [Entered: 02/02/2023 10:37 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Reporters Transcript required: Yes. Sentence imposed: LIFE. Transcript ordered by 02/21/2023. Transcript due 03/23/2023. Appellant briefs and excerpts due by 05/02/2023 for Steve Jackson Rodriguez. Appellee brief due 06/01/2023 for United States of America. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12644367] (ABT) [Entered: 02/01/2023 04:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Steve Rodriguez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Scott Michael Lara |
| Represented By: | Catharine Richmond |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: STEVE JACKSON RODRIGUEZ | |
| Represented By: | George Karl Rosenstock |
| Represented By: | Margaret A. Farrand |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
