USA v. Cau Hong
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
CAU HONG, AKA Cay A., AKA Hong, AKA A. Cau Hong, AKA Calvin Hong, AKA Cau Kevin Hong, AKA Kevin Calvin Hong, AKA Kevin Cau Hong, AKA Kevin Cay Hong, AKA Thai Binh Hong |
23-50038 |
February 17, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 23-50038: IFP] ). [12659126] (HH) [Entered: 02/22/2023 03:31 PM] |
Filing 4 Received copy of District Court order filed on 02/22/2023: Order granting motoin for leave to appeal in forma pauperis. [12659125] (HH) [Entered: 02/22/2023 03:31 PM] |
Filing 3 Mailed a copy of 2/22/23 order [ # 2 ] to pro se appellant at Reg. No. 20301-112, Santa Ana City Jail, 62 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701 [12658658] (WL) [Entered: 02/22/2023 12:03 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KG): Appellant proceeded in forma pauperis in the district court and that status has not been revoked. Therefore, the Clerk will amend the docket to reflect that appellant is proceeding in forma pauperis on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). Court records show that counsel Meghan A. Blanco was appointed under the Criminal Justice Act to represent appellant before the district court and has not been granted leave to withdraw. Counsel has a duty to continue to represent appellant on appeal until counsel is relieved by this court. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(a). Therefore, although appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal, counsel Blanco remains responsible for prosecuting this appeal and has been entered on the docket as counsel of record. If counsel wishes to withdraw, within 21 days of this order, she must file in this court a motion to withdraw that complies with the requirements of Ninth Circuit Rule 4-1(c). If counsel does not move to withdraw, the existing briefing schedule will remain in effect. The Clerk will serve this order on counsel Blanco and on appellant individually: Reg. No. 20301-112, Santa Ana City Jail, 62 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, CA 92701. [12658647] (WL) [Entered: 02/22/2023 12:00 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Reporters Transcript required: Yes. Sentence imposed: 168 months. Transcript ordered by 03/10/2023. Transcript due 04/10/2023. Appellant briefs and excerpts due by 05/19/2023 for Cau Hong. Appellee brief due 06/20/2023 for United States of America. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. (Appeal filed Pro se, Counsel still Appointed) [12655779] (JMR) [Entered: 02/17/2023 11:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Cau Hong | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Shawn T. Andrews Esquire |
Represented By: | Anna Boylan |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: CAU HONG, AKA Cay A., AKA Hong, AKA A. Cau Hong, AKA Calvin Hong, AKA Cau Kevin Hong, AKA Kevin Calvin Hong, AKA Kevin Cau Hong, AKA Kevin Cay Hong, AKA Thai Binh Hong | |
Represented By: | Meghan A. Blanco |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.