Arredondo Hernandez v. Garland
| DAVID ARREDONDO HERNANDEZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 23-501 |
| March 27, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 17) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The respondent's answering brief is due November 29, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 09/12/2023 03:05 PM]
|
| Filing 17 MOTION to Extend Time to File Answering Brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/11/2023 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 16 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Kristin Moresi [Entered: 08/29/2023 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kristin Moresi for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/29/2023 02:17 PM] |
| Filing 14 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 12 by Petitioner David Arredondo Hernandez received. [Entered: 08/09/2023 03:31 PM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 12 by Petitioner David Arredondo Hernandez is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/31/2023 03:11 PM]
|
| Filing 12 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner David Arredondo Hernandez. [Entered: 07/31/2023 10:16 AM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 10) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due 7/31/2023, Answering Brief Due 9/29/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 06/26/2023 04:32 PM]
|
| Filing 10 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner David Arredondo Hernandez. [Entered: 06/26/2023 03:42 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED. The government did not timely respond to the motion for stay of removal. The absence of a response is treated as a statement of non-opposition; the temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/30/2023 12:25 PM]
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 04/12/2023 08:51 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Lisa Morinelli for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/27/2023 08:23 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lisa Morinelli for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/27/2023 08:11 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 5/1/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 5/22/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 6/30/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 8/29/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/27/2023 07:24 AM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 3/24/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-501 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/27/2023 07:21 AM] |
| Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 3/8/2023. [Entered: 03/27/2023 07:19 AM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/27/2023 07:19 AM] |
| Filing 1 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 03/27/2023 07:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Arredondo Hernandez v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DAVID ARREDONDO HERNANDEZ | |
| Represented By: | Mr. David Haghighi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Ms. Kristin Moresi |
| Represented By: | Lisa Morinelli |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
