Lopez de Flores, et al. v. Garland
Petitioner: PATRICIA VICTORIA LOPEZ DE FLORES and NORMAN RIQUELMI FLORES-LOPEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 23-503
Filed: March 27, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER FILED. Pursuant to respondents unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 19), the Clerk will close this courts docket for administrative purposes until further order of the court. This order is not a decision on the merits and has no impact on any stay of removal. No mandate will issue, and at any time any party may request that this immigration petition be reopened, or the court may reopen the petition sua sponte. Within 14 days after a determination at the agency level that petitioner is eligible for discretionary relief, the parties are expected to file a motion to remand. The parties may request a referral to mediation at any time it might benefit the case. [Entered: 09/26/2023 02:05 PM]
September 21, 2023 Filing 19 MOTION to Administratively Close Case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/21/2023 02:21 PM]
August 7, 2023 Filing 18 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 15 by Petitioner Patricia Victoria Lopez de Flores, Petitioner Norman Riquelmi Flores-Lopez received. [Entered: 08/07/2023 02:30 PM]
August 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 15 by Petitioners Patricia Victoria Lopez de Flores and Norman Riquelmi Flores-Lopez is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/01/2023 12:23 PM]
July 31, 2023 Filing 16 DEFECTIVE --- EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Petitioner Patricia Victoria Lopez de Flores, Petitioner Norman Riquelmi Flores-Lopez.--[Wrong filing type, correct entry is DE 15] [Entered: 07/31/2023 07:27 PM] [Edited: 08/01/2023 11:21 AM]
July 31, 2023 Filing 15 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Patricia Victoria Lopez de Flores, Petitioner Norman Riquelmi Flores-Lopez.--[COURT UPDATE: Attached addendum] [Entered: 07/31/2023 06:20 PM] [Edited: 08/01/2023 11:17 AM]
June 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 13) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due 7/31/2023, Answering Brief Due 9/29/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 06/30/2023 03:01 PM]
June 30, 2023 Filing 13 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Patricia Victoria Lopez de Flores, Petitioner Norman Riquelmi Flores-Lopez. [Entered: 06/30/2023 02:50 PM]
April 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 04/21/2023 02:37 PM]
April 21, 2023 Filing 11 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/21/2023 11:19 AM]
April 10, 2023 Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 04/10/2023 08:34 AM]
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 4) is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The certified administrative record remains due May 1, 2023. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due May 22, 2023. The opening brief is due June 30, 2023. The answering brief is due August 29, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 03/28/2023 03:08 PM]
March 28, 2023 Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Amber Ashley Arthur for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/28/2023 07:55 AM]
March 28, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Amber Ashley Arthur for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/28/2023 06:02 AM]
March 27, 2023 Filing 6 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 5/1/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 5/22/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 6/30/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 8/29/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/27/2023 07:38 AM]
March 27, 2023 Filing 5 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 3/26/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-503 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/27/2023 07:36 AM]
March 26, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/27/2023 07:35 AM]
March 26, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 03/27/2023 07:35 AM]
March 26, 2023 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 2/23/2023. [Entered: 03/27/2023 07:35 AM]
March 26, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/27/2023 07:35 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lopez de Flores, et al. v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: PATRICIA VICTORIA LOPEZ DE FLORES
Represented By: Doctor Wayne Spindler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: NORMAN RIQUELMI FLORES-LOPEZ
Represented By: Doctor Wayne Spindler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Amber Ashley Arthur
Represented By: Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?