Lopez-Escobar, et al. v. Garland
JOSE FRANCISCO LOPEZ-ESCOBAR and SAMUEL ALFREDO LOPEZ-LANDAVERDE |
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
23-524 |
March 28, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 12) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due December 6, 2023. The answering brief is due February 5, 2024. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 10/02/2023 01:34 PM] |
Filing 12 MOTION to Extend Time to File Opening Brief filed by Petitioner Jose Francisco Lopez-Escobar, Petitioner Samuel Alfredo Lopez-Landaverde. [Entered: 09/27/2023 02:21 PM] |
Filing 11 ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 10) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due October 3, 2023. The answering brief is due December 4, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 06/29/2023 05:07 PM] |
Filing 10 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Jose Francisco Lopez-Escobar, Petitioner Samuel Alfredo Lopez-Landaverde. [Entered: 06/28/2023 01:42 PM] |
Filing 9 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 04/11/2023 07:28 AM] |
Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Anthony Cardozo Payne for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/29/2023 10:56 AM] |
Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Abigail Evelyn Leach for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/29/2023 10:51 AM] |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anthony Cardozo Payne for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/29/2023 05:17 AM] |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Abigail Evelyn Leach for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/29/2023 05:15 AM] |
Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 5/2/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 7/3/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 8/30/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. COURT UPDATE: Respondent Response to Stay Motion deadline set in error. [Entered: 03/28/2023 01:31 PM] [Edited: 04/10/2023 03:08 PM] |
Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 3/28/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-524 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/28/2023 01:28 PM] |
Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 3/7/2023. [Entered: 03/28/2023 01:27 PM] |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/28/2023 01:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.