United States of America v. Linder
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| BRANDON ROSS LINDER |
| 23-538 |
| March 30, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (William C. CANBY, Consuelo M. CALLAHAN, John B. OWENS) AFFIRMED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 09/27/2023 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 23 Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 21 by Appellant Brandon Ross Linder received. [Entered: 08/25/2023 02:52 PM] |
Filing 22
ORDER FILED. Reply Brief submitted at DE 21 by Appellant Brandon Ross Linder is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/21/2023 01:57 PM]
|
| Filing 21 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Brandon Ross Linder. [Entered: 08/18/2023 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 20 Paper copies (3) of presentence report submitted at DE 11 by Appellant Brandon Ross Linder received. [Entered: 08/07/2023 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 19 Paper copies (3) of Excerpts of Record in 3 Volume(s) and Index Volume submitted at DE 9 and DE 12 received. [Entered: 08/07/2023 11:50 AM] |
| Filing 18 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 15 by Appellee United States of America received. [Entered: 08/02/2023 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 17 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 8 by Appellant Brandon Ross Linder received. [Entered: 08/01/2023 02:46 PM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 15 by Appellee United States of America is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellee must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/31/2023 08:52 AM]
|
| Filing 15 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 07/28/2023 09:05 AM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 8 by Appellant Brandon Ross Linder is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The excerpts of record submitted at DE 9, DE 12 by Appellant Brandon Ross Linder are filed. Within 7 days of this order, Appellant must file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white front covers. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/24/2023 10:29 AM]
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. 10) to file under seal Volume 3 of the excerpts of record is denied because it does not describe the potential for irreparable injury and request the least restrictive scope of sealing, as required by Ninth Circuit Rule 27-13. Any party may file a renewed motion to seal, due within 21 days of this order, that specifically addresses why the documents in the sealed volumes must be maintained under seal and whether redaction of the material would be feasible. The Clerk will maintain under seal Volume 3 until the expiration of the 21-day period, and until resolution of a renewed motion if one is timely filed. If no renewed motion is filed, the Clerk will publicly file the motion to seal, the opening brief and Volumes 1-3 of the excerpts of record. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [Entered: 06/29/2023 10:05 AM]
|
| Filing 12 EXCERPTS OF RECORD Volume 3 submitted for filing by Appellant Brandon Ross Linder. (Court entered filing of excerpts originally submitted at DE 10)--[UPDATE: Unsealed per order at DE 13] [Entered: 06/08/2023 03:38 PM] [Edited: 07/24/2023 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 11 Presentence Report UNDER SEAL filed by Appellant Brandon Ross Linder. [Entered: 06/08/2023 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 10 MOTION to file document under seal and proposed sealed document filed by Appellant Brandon Ross Linder.--[COURT UPDATE: Unlocked motion per order at DE 13] [Entered: 06/08/2023 10:43 AM] [Edited: 07/24/2023 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 9 EXCERPTS OF RECORD submitted for filing by Appellant Brandon Ross Linder. [Entered: 06/08/2023 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 8 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Brandon Ross Linder. [Entered: 06/08/2023 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 7 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellee Amy Elizabeth Potter representing Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 06/07/2023 07:17 AM] |
| Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Appellee Suzanne Miles for Appellee United States of America. [Entered: 06/07/2023 07:15 AM] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Suzanne Miles for Appellee United States of America replacing Amy Elizabeth Potter. [Entered: 06/07/2023 06:45 AM] |
| Filing 4 ADDED Counsel for Appellant Elizabeth Gillingham Daily for Appellant Brandon Ross Linder. [Entered: 06/06/2023 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Elizabeth Gillingham Daily for Appellant Brandon Ross Linder. [Entered: 06/06/2023 04:30 PM] |
| Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence imposed: 9 Months. Appeal Transcript Order Due 4/19/2023, Appeal Transcript Due 5/19/2023, Appeal Opening Brief Due 6/28/2023, Appeal Answering Brief Due 7/28/2023. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct sentence imposed.] [Entered: 03/30/2023 03:32 PM] [Edited: 04/04/2023 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-538 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Counsel should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/30/2023 03:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Linder | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Suzanne Miles |
| Represented By: | Gary Y. Sussman |
| Represented By: | Amy Elizabeth Potter |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: BRANDON ROSS LINDER | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Gillingham Daily |
| Represented By: | Ms. Tihanne Mar-Shall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
