Efficient Task Limited v. Pacific Bridge Global, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellee: EFFICIENT TASK LIMITED
Defendant / Appellant: PACIFIC BRIDGE GLOBAL, INC., a California Corporation
Case Number: 23-55017
Filed: January 10, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2023 Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12655557] (VS) [Entered: 02/17/2023 09:25 AM]
February 13, 2023 Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/12/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12651335]. [23-55017] (AD) [Entered: 02/13/2023 06:44 AM]
February 12, 2023 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Pacific Bridge Global, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/12/2023. [12651323] [23-55017] (Weiser, Frank) [Entered: 02/12/2023 07:02 PM]
January 31, 2023 Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 02/14/2023, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12643139] (VS) [Entered: 01/31/2023 12:53 PM]
January 23, 2023 Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12636555] (BLS) [Entered: 01/23/2023 04:57 PM]
January 10, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Pacific Bridge Global, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/17/2023. Transcript ordered by 02/03/2023. Transcript due 03/06/2023. Appellant Pacific Bridge Global, Inc. opening brief due 04/14/2023. Appellee Efficient Task Limited answering brief due 05/15/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12627342] (JBS) [Entered: 01/10/2023 02:04 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Efficient Task Limited v. Pacific Bridge Global, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: EFFICIENT TASK LIMITED
Represented By: Brett Hall Ramsaur
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: PACIFIC BRIDGE GLOBAL, INC., a California Corporation
Represented By: Frank Alan Weiser Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?