Gregory Van Huisen v. Charles Brown, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Defendant / Appellee: CHARLES BROWN, Chief of Staff, United States Air Force, BILL J. BURNS, CIA Director, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President and JAMES C. MCCONNILLE, Chief of Staff and Acting Superior Iscon
Case Number: 23-55077
Filed: January 25, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2023 Filing 20 Filed Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen letter dated 03/12/2023 re: Supporting evidence. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12676511] (QDL) [Entered: 03/17/2023 02:17 PM]
March 9, 2023 Filing 19 Filed Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen letter dated 03/02/2023 re: Legal mail. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12670859] (QDL) [Entered: 03/09/2023 02:55 PM]
March 2, 2023 Filing 18 Filed Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen letter dated 02/24/2023 re: Declaration. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12666327] (QDL) [Entered: 03/02/2023 03:29 PM]
February 23, 2023 Filing 17 Filed Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen response to order to show cause dated 02/07/2023. [12660090] (QDL) [Entered: 02/23/2023 02:54 PM]
February 14, 2023 Filing 16 Filed Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen motion for generic amicus curiae. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/01/2023. [12653230] (QDL) [Entered: 02/14/2023 03:58 PM]
February 14, 2023 Filing 12 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen opening brief of 22 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 02/01/2023. (Briefing remains stayed) [12653009] (LA) [Entered: 02/14/2023 02:22 PM]
February 13, 2023 Filing 15 Filed Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen letter dated 02/08/2023 re: Request for marshal's office to serve. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12653104] (QDL) [Entered: 02/14/2023 03:07 PM]
February 13, 2023 Filing 14 Filed Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen request for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/08/2023. [12653101] (QDL) [Entered: 02/14/2023 03:04 PM]
February 13, 2023 Filing 13 Filed Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen letter dated 02/07/2023 re: Request for additional time for COA if necessary, introduction of further evidence. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12653098] (QDL) [Entered: 02/14/2023 03:03 PM]
February 7, 2023 Filing 11 Filed Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen letter dated 02/02/2023 re: My completed packet to file appeal was sealed and given to CDCR counselor. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12649420] (QDL) [Entered: 02/08/2023 04:44 PM]
February 7, 2023 Filing 10 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. All pending motions will be addressed, if necessary, after resolution of this order. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12648251] (AF) [Entered: 02/07/2023 02:30 PM]
February 3, 2023 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen motion for temporary injunctive relief. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/31/2023. [12646051] (QDL) [Entered: 02/03/2023 03:24 PM]
February 3, 2023 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/31/2023. [12646044] (QDL) [Entered: 02/03/2023 03:23 PM]
February 3, 2023 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/31/2023. [12646041] (QDL) [Entered: 02/03/2023 03:21 PM]
February 1, 2023 Filing 9 Filed Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen letter dated 01/28/2023 re: Relevant evidence. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12647326] (QDL) [Entered: 02/06/2023 03:57 PM]
January 26, 2023 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen letter dated 01/23/2023 re: Additional relevant evidence. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12642296] (QDL) [Entered: 01/30/2023 02:56 PM]
January 25, 2023 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen letter dated 01/19/2023 re: Declaration/exhibit. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12639862] (QDL) [Entered: 01/26/2023 02:32 PM]
January 25, 2023 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen letter dated 01/19/2023 re: Copy of inmate statement report. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12639832] (QDL) [Entered: 01/26/2023 02:25 PM]
January 25, 2023 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12638324] (CKP) [Entered: 01/25/2023 01:21 PM]
January 25, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Gregory Scott Van Huisen opening brief due 03/27/2023. [12638081] (RT) [Entered: 01/25/2023 10:36 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gregory Van Huisen v. Charles Brown, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN
Represented By: Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHARLES BROWN, Chief of Staff, United States Air Force
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BILL J. BURNS, CIA Director
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JAMES C. MCCONNILLE, Chief of Staff and Acting Superior Iscon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?