Ivin Mood v. City of Newport Beach, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: IVIN MOOD
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Case Number: 23-55103
Filed: February 2, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2023 Filing 13 Filed Appellant Ivin Mood motion for leave pending appeal to proceed on appeal In Forma Pauperis, and motion for F.R.Civ. P. 5.1. Deficiencies: None. [12683216] (NAC) [Entered: 03/28/2023 08:55 AM]
February 28, 2023 Filing 12 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is frivolous and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12663925] (CKP) [Entered: 02/28/2023 02:26 PM]
February 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Received copy of District Court order filed on 02/27/2023. IN CHAMBERS PROCEEDINGS: ORDER REVOKING PLAINTIFF'S IFP STATUS by Judge Stephen V. Wilson [12662753] (NAC) [Entered: 02/27/2023 02:43 PM]
February 27, 2023 Filing 10 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Ivin Mood opening brief of 18 pages (Informal: No). (motions pending, briefing remains stayed.) Served on 02/21/2023. [12662586] (KT) [Entered: 02/27/2023 01:47 PM]
February 21, 2023 Filing 9 Filed Appellant Ivin Mood motion for leave of Court to amend motion to show cause and motion to reopen the record. Deficiencies: None. [12658129] (NAC) [Entered: 02/22/2023 07:57 AM]
February 14, 2023 Filing 7 Streamlined request by Appellant Ivin Mood to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. Briefing shall be reset as necessary upon the Courts disposition of the motion to appoint counsel. Docket [5]. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [12653033] (DLM) [Entered: 02/14/2023 02:41 PM]
February 13, 2023 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Ivin Mood motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12654924] (NAC) [Entered: 02/16/2023 01:55 PM]
February 13, 2023 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Ivin Mood motion to extend time to file a reply to a response/pending motion. Deficiencies: None. [12652466] (NAC) [Entered: 02/14/2023 08:03 AM]
February 13, 2023 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Ivin Mood motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12652465] (NAC) [Entered: 02/14/2023 08:01 AM]
February 13, 2023 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Ivin Mood motion for leave of Court to amend motion to show cause and motion to reopen the record. Deficiencies: None. [12652464] (NAC) [Entered: 02/14/2023 08:00 AM]
February 13, 2023 Filing 3 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Ivin Mood opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served via ECF on 02/13/2023. [12652040] (KT) [Entered: 02/13/2023 02:47 PM]
February 8, 2023 Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12649391] (CKP) [Entered: 02/08/2023 04:24 PM]
February 2, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ivin Mood opening brief due 03/27/2023. [12644724] (JBS) [Entered: 02/02/2023 11:07 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ivin Mood v. City of Newport Beach, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: IVIN MOOD
Represented By: Ivin Mood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?