Jan Biro v. G. R. Keyes, et al
| JAN CHARLES BIRO, MD. PhD. and JAN CHARLES BIRO, M.D., MD. PhD. |
| G. R. KEYES, M.D. and ATTY. C. PHILLIPS, personal capacity |
| 23-55132 |
| February 13, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Streamlined request [12] by Appellant Doctor Jan Charles Biro, M.D. to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed until resolution of the pending motion for summary disposition. [12692930] (BG) [Entered: 04/11/2023 08:20 AM] |
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Doctor Jan Charles Biro, M.D.. New requested due date is 05/12/2023. [12692889] [23-55132] (Biro, Jan) [Entered: 04/10/2023 09:57 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellee G. R. Keyes, M.D. response opposing motion ([ # 9 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 9 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion for summary disposition). Date of service: 04/10/2023. [12692118] [23-55132] (Rankin, Amy) [Entered: 04/10/2023 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellee C. Phillips response opposing motion ([ # 9 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 9 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 04/06/2023. [12690493] [23-55132] (Martin, Timothy) [Entered: 04/06/2023 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant Doctor Jan Charles Biro, M.D. Motion for summary disposition. Date of service: 03/31/2023. [12688701] --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [8] .] (TYL) [Entered: 04/04/2023 12:29 PM] |
| Filing 8 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 9 ]. Original Text: Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Doctor Jan Charles Biro, M.D.. Date of service: 03/31/2023. [12687023] [23-55132] (Biro, Jan) [Entered: 03/31/2023 06:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) Amy Rankin for party(s) Appellee G. R. Keyes, in case 23-55132. [12674190] (JFF) [Entered: 03/14/2023 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Amy E. Rankin (Cole Pedroza LLP, 2295 Huntington Drive, San Marino, California 91108) for Appellee G. R. Keyes, M.D.. Date of service: 03/14/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12674115] [23-55132] (Rankin, Amy) [Entered: 03/14/2023 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 5 Attorney Ryan Salsig in 23-55132 substituted by Attorney Timothy William Martin in 23-55132 [12673888] (JFF) [Entered: 03/14/2023 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Timothy W. Martin (Los Angeles City Attorney's Office, 200 No. Spring Street, 14th Floor, City Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90012) for Appellee C. Phillips. Substitution for Attorney Ryan Salsig, Esquire for Appellee C. Phillips. Date of service: 03/14/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12673615] [23-55132] (Martin, Timothy) [Entered: 03/14/2023 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 02/17/2023. [12655416] (BY) [Entered: 02/17/2023 07:30 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12652904] (CKP) [Entered: 02/14/2023 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jan Charles Biro opening brief due 04/13/2023. Appellees G. R. Keyes and C. Phillips answering brief due 05/15/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12652143] (JBS) [Entered: 02/13/2023 03:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
