Anthony Conners v. Michael, et al
ANTHONY CONNERS |
MICHAEL, in individual capacity :in official capacity, DOE 1, in individual and official capacities, DOE 2, in individual and official capacities, JOHN, in individual capacity and and official capacity, CATHERINE GIRON, Nurse, individual capacity, MICHAEL VAN NORMAN, Nurse, individual capacity and KATHY, in official capacity; and in individual capacity |
23-55204 |
March 6, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (AWT, SRT and LHK) [12699111] (NAC) [Entered: 04/20/2023 08:07 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and LUCY H. KOH)A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12685043] (WL) [Entered: 03/29/2023 03:19 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Anthony Conners motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12683222] (NAC) [Entered: 03/28/2023 08:58 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Anthony Conners opening brief due 04/28/2023. [12667958] (ABT) [Entered: 03/06/2023 01:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.