Danielle Victor v. Southwest Wine and Spirits, LLC, et al
| DANIELLE VICTOR |
| SOUTHWEST WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, WALLYS AUCTION HOUSE, LLC, a California limited liability company, MEL-JEN, a California limited liability company, PAUL MARCIANO, MAURICE MARCIANO, an individual, CHRISTIAN NAVARRO, an individual, THOMAS KACHANI, an individual, MATTHEW TURNER, MATTHEW MARCIANO, an individual, JONATHAN POULIN, an individual, MINA JONES, an individual, NANCY HUNTER, an individual, SAMI FROMER, an individual, TATUM JIMENEZ, an individual, CHRISTIE BAKER, an individual, KEITH BJELAJAC, an individual, LAURA BURNS, an individual, CHRISTIES WINE, INC., a corporation operating under Delaware law, CHRISTIES, INC., a corporation operating under New York/New Jersey law, 3900 WA ASSOCIATES, LLC, a corporation operating under Delaware law, DELTA AIR LINES, INC., a corporation operating under Delaware law, WALTER MOSLEY, an individual, NATHALIE MEZA CONTRERAS, an individual, NATHALIE MEZA CONTRERAS LAW, a Professional Croporation, a California corporation, CARLOS EDUARDO MONTOYA SOLIS, an individual, JUAN J. DOMINGUEZ, an individual, JAE HYUN KIM, an individual, KACEY R. RICCOMINI, an individual, ARTHUR F. SILBERGELD, an individual, THOMPSON COBURN, LLP, a limited liability partnership of the District of Columbia, MITCHELL NEIL REINIS, an individual, AMANDA HEADWORTH, an individual, BLANCA GUTIERREZ, an individual, DOMINGUEZ LAW FIRM, PC, a Florida limited liability, SALLY D. GREIG, an individual, SALLY D. GREIG, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, in its full capacity, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, in its full capacity, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, in its full capacity and DOES, Individual Does, 1-100, inclusive; Does 1-100, inclusive |
| 23-55256 |
| March 21, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Danielle Victor notice of second appeal and request to be reviewed en banc. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/01/2023. [12730190]--[COURT NOTE: NAN, NOA filed in district court and new appeal opened. 08/22/2023 by SLM] (RL) [Entered: 06/06/2023 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed order (JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN, MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND and JENNIFER SUNG) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir. 1989) (denial of temporary restraining order is appealable only if the denial is tantamount to the denial of a preliminary injunction). The courts March 22, 2023 scheduling order is vacated, and this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12728834] (ABT) [Entered: 06/05/2023 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 6 ENTRY UPDATED. Filed Appellant Danielle Victor application for complex designation, petition for coordination, and request for stay of all included actions supporting memorandum and points and authorities; declaration. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/15/2023. [12717844]--[Edited 05/17/2023 by RL] (RL) [Entered: 05/17/2023 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Danielle Victor request to expedite appeal, to be reviewed en banc. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/03/2023. [12690674] (RL) [Entered: 04/06/2023 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The appeal filed March 14, 2023 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. Appellants opening brief is due April 19, 2023. Because there are no appearances for appellees, briefing will be completed upon the filing of appellants opening brief. The appeal and any motions pending at the time briefing is completed will be referred to the next available motions panel for disposition. No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief will result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [12679443] (CKP) [Entered: 03/22/2023 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 4 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12679680] (RL) [Entered: 03/22/2023 02:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Danielle Victor FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed in forma pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/14/2023. [12679673] (RL) [Entered: 03/22/2023 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: To be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal, C.R. 3-3. [12678896] (JBS) [Entered: 03/21/2023 03:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
