O. L. v. County of Orange, et al
| O. L., AKA Jane Doe and JANE DOE |
| COUNTY OF ORANGE, DON BARNES, WILLIAM BAKER, JOE BALICKI, MARK STICHTER, REYNA RIVERA, DEVONNA FALCONER, KASSANDRA MAYER, ELIA RODRIGUEZ and RACHEL ADDINGTON |
| 23-55258 |
| March 21, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Streamlined request [2] by Appellant Ms. O. L. to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant O. L. opening brief due 06/21/2023. Appellees Rachel Addington, William Baker, Joe Balicki, Don Barnes, County of Orange, Devonna Falconer, Kassandra Mayer, Reyna Rivera, Elia Rodriguez and Mark Stichter answering brief due 07/21/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12715791] (DR) [Entered: 05/15/2023 12:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Ms. O. L.. New requested due date is 06/20/2023. [12715556] [23-55258] (Doe, Jane) [Entered: 05/15/2023 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant O. L. opening brief due 05/22/2023. Appellees Rachel Addington, William Baker, Joe Balicki, Don Barnes, County of Orange, Devonna Falconer, Kassandra Mayer, Reyna Rivera, Elia Rodriguez and Mark Stichter answering brief due 06/22/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12678968] (RT) [Entered: 03/21/2023 04:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
