Keith McIver v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, et al
| KEITH MCIVER |
| METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, THE BOEING COMPANY, EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS COMMITTEE and DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 23-55306 |
| April 4, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Employee Retirement |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 06/07/2023. The dial-in telephone conference previously scheduled for 06/07/2023, is cancelled. See order for details. [12726458] (CL) [Entered: 06/01/2023 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 10 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 06/07/2023, 12:30 p.m. Pacific Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: Appellant Keith McIver opening brief due 08/11/2023. Appellees Does, Employee Benefit Plans Committee, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and The Boeing Company answering brief due 09/12/2023. Appellant optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See order for details. [12708595] (CL) [Entered: 05/04/2023 07:17 AM] |
| Filing 9 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 23-55306: Paid] ). [12701956] (TSP) [Entered: 04/24/2023 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 05/03/2023, 1:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12694420] (CL) [Entered: 04/12/2023 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 7 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/11/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12693449]. [23-55306] (AD) [Entered: 04/11/2023 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Keith McIver Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/11/2023. [12693350] [23-55306] (McMillen, Joseph) [Entered: 04/11/2023 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 5 Received copy of 2nd amended notice of appeal from district court. [12689869] (RL) [Entered: 04/05/2023 03:03 PM] |
| Filing 4 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12689867] (RL) [Entered: 04/05/2023 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Eric P. Mathisen for party(s) Appellee Employee Benefit Plans Committee Appellee The Boeing Company. [12689748] (RL) [Entered: 04/05/2023 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Eric Peter Mathisen (Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., 56 S. Washington St., Suite 302, Valparaiso, IN 46383) for Appellees Employee Benefit Plans Committee and The Boeing Company. Date of service: 04/05/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12689740] [23-55306] (Mathisen, Eric) [Entered: 04/05/2023 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Keith McIver Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/11/2023. Transcript ordered by 05/03/2023. Transcript due 06/02/2023. Appellant Keith McIver opening brief due 07/12/2023. Appellees Does, Employee Benefit Plans Committee, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and The Boeing Company answering brief due 08/11/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12689082] (JMR) [Entered: 04/04/2023 04:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
