Roque Solis v. Raymond Madden
Petitioner / Appellant: ROQUE SOLIS
Respondent / Appellee: RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Case Number: 23-55334
Filed: April 13, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2023 Filing 9 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Breana Frankels motion to withdraw as appellants counsel of record (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) is granted. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(c). The Clerk will serve a copy of this order on appellant Roque Solis (BG1589) at Centinela State Prison, P.O. Box 901, Imperial, CA 92251, and will update the docket to reflect that appellant is proceeding pro se. Appellants motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel are referred to the panel that will resolve the merits of appellants request for a certificate of appealability. [12716684] (WL) [Entered: 05/16/2023 10:50 AM]
May 12, 2023 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Roque Solis Renewed motion. Attorney(s) Attorney Breana Frankel for Appellant Roque Solis motion to withdraw as counsel. Date of service: 05/12/2023. [12714861] [23-55334] (Frankel, Breana) [Entered: 05/12/2023 12:53 PM]
April 24, 2023 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Roque Solis motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12703207] (JFF) [Entered: 04/26/2023 10:30 AM]
April 24, 2023 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Roque Solis motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12703203] (JFF) [Entered: 04/26/2023 10:26 AM]
April 24, 2023 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Roque Solis motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. [12703195] (JFF) [Entered: 04/26/2023 10:21 AM]
April 20, 2023 Filing 4 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Breana Frankels motion to withdraw as appellants counsel of record (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied without prejudice to renewal within 21 days after this order. Any renewed motion must be served on appellant and must include appellants current address. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(c). [12699648] (WL) [Entered: 04/20/2023 02:32 PM]
April 17, 2023 Filing 3 Received copy of motion filed in district court re:Motion filed by Appellant Roque Solis. [12698323] (JFF) [Entered: 04/19/2023 09:32 AM]
April 15, 2023 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Roque Solis motion. Attorney(s) Attorney Breana Frankel for Appellant Roque Solis motion to withdraw as counsel. Date of service: 04/15/2023. [12696297] [23-55334] (Frankel, Breana) [Entered: 04/15/2023 10:40 AM]
April 13, 2023 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 03/27/2023. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12695313] (OC) [Entered: 04/13/2023 03:02 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Roque Solis v. Raymond Madden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ROQUE SOLIS
Represented By: Breana Frankel
Represented By: Roque Solis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden
Represented By: Ana R. Duarte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?