Takeya USA Corporation v. PowerPlay Marketing Group, LLC
TAKEYA USA CORPORATION, a California corporation |
POWERPLAY MARKETING GROUP, LLC |
23-55376 |
April 24, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Granting Motion (ECF Filing) Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]), this appeal is voluntarily dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [12727264] (JMR) [Entered: 06/02/2023 09:22 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant PowerPlay Marketing Group, LLC Stipulated Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 05/31/2023. [12725953] [23-55376] (Schilken, Elizabeth) [Entered: 05/31/2023 03:30 PM] |
Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: Conference 06/01/2023 is canceled. By 06/09/2023, Appellant to file a motion or stipulation to dismiss, or contact the circuit mediator. See order for details. [12724066] (VS) [Entered: 05/30/2023 08:45 AM] |
Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 06/01/2023, 1:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12710081] (BLS) [Entered: 05/05/2023 03:08 PM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/01/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12706751]. [23-55376] (AD) [Entered: 05/01/2023 06:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant PowerPlay Marketing Group, LLC Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/01/2023. [12706222] [23-55376] (Schilken, Elizabeth) [Entered: 05/01/2023 01:43 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant PowerPlay Marketing Group, LLC Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/01/2023. Transcript ordered by 05/19/2023. Transcript due 06/20/2023. Appellant PowerPlay Marketing Group, LLC opening brief due 07/28/2023. Appellee Takeya USA Corporation answering brief due 08/28/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12701791] (JBS) [Entered: 04/24/2023 03:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Takeya USA Corporation v. PowerPlay Marketing Group, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: TAKEYA USA CORPORATION, a California corporation | |
Represented By: | Stephen Leonard Ram |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Counter claimant: POWERPLAY MARKETING GROUP, LLC | |
Represented By: | Elizabeth L. Schilken Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.