Kimberly Marroquin v. City of Los Angeles, et al
| UNIDENTIFIED LAPD OFFICER, RICHARD PAUL STABILE, Captain, MATTHEW CLYMER, Officer, # 35204, ALFRED CORSO, Officer, # 31160, LYMAN, Officer, # 38908, SANTIAGO, Officer, # 38473, HERMAN USMA, Officer, # 34439, WILLIAM THOMAS, Officer, # 41752, MARVIN PEREZ, Officer, # 43105, ANTHONY CARILLO, Officer, # 43442 and DOMINIC SANTIAGO, Sgt., # 34994 |
| KIMBERLY MARROQUIN |
| CITY OF LOS ANGELES and DIMAGGIO RICO, Officer, # 43442 |
| 23-55423 |
| May 9, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: These cases are RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12734107] [23-55423, 23-55461] (CL) [Entered: 06/12/2023 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 13 Added Attorney Steven B. Stevens for Kimberly Marroquin, in cases 23-55423 and 23-55461. [12730049] [23-55423, 23-55461] (HH) [Entered: 06/06/2023 02:33 PM] |
| Filing 12 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 06/13/2023. See order for details. [12729902] [23-55423, 23-55461] (CL) [Entered: 06/06/2023 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Steven B. Stevens (Steven B. Stevens, A Prof. Corp., 2934 1/2 Beverly Glen Circle, Suite 477, Los Angeles, California 90077) for Appellee Kimberly Marroquin in 23-55423, Appellant Kimberly Marroquin in 23-55461. Date of service: 06/06/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12729683] [23-55423, 23-55461] (Stevens, Steven) [Entered: 06/06/2023 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 10 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 06/06/2023, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12725655] [23-55423, 23-55461] (CL) [Entered: 05/31/2023 12:51 PM] |
| Filing 9 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/24/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12722358]. [23-55423] (AD) [Entered: 05/24/2023 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kimberly Marroquin in 23-55461, Appellee Kimberly Marroquin in 23-55423 Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/24/2023. [12721985] [23-55461, 23-55423] (Conlogue, Kevin) [Entered: 05/24/2023 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 7 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. Setting cross-appeal briefing schedule as follows: Appellant Kimberly Marroquin Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/31/2023. First cross appeal brief due 08/15/2023 for City of Los Angeles and Dimaggio Rico. Second brief on cross appeal due 09/15/2023 for Kimberly Marroquin. Third brief on cross appeal due 10/16/2023 for City of Los Angeles and Dimaggio Rico. Optional cross appeal reply brief is due within 21 days of third brief on cross appeal. [12721764] [23-55461, 23-55423] (JBS) [Entered: 05/24/2023 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 05/30/2023, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12718682] (CL) [Entered: 05/18/2023 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/16/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12716823]. [23-55423] (AD) [Entered: 05/16/2023 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Dimaggio Rico and City of Los Angeles Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/16/2023. [12716737] [23-55423] (Eisenman, Jonathan) [Entered: 05/16/2023 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 3 Attorneys Muna Busailah, Robert Rabe and Michael P. Stone substituted by Attorney Jonathan H. Eisenman in 23-55423. [12711912] (HH) [Entered: 05/09/2023 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jonathan H. Eisenman (Los Angeles City Attorney's Office, 200 No. Spring Street, 14th Floor, City Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90012) for Appellants City of Los Angeles and Dimaggio Rico. Substitution for Muna Busailah for Appellants City of Los Angeles and Dimaggio Rico, Robert Rabe, Esquire for Appellants City of Los Angeles and Dimaggio Rico and Mr. Michael P. Stone for Appellants City of Los Angeles and Dimaggio Rico. Date of service: 05/09/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12711901] [23-55423] (Eisenman, Jonathan) [Entered: 05/09/2023 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants City of Los Angeles and Dimaggio Rico Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/16/2023. Transcript ordered by 06/08/2023. Transcript due 07/06/2023. Appellants City of Los Angeles and Dimaggio Rico opening brief due 08/15/2023. Appellee Kimberly Marroquin answering brief due 09/15/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12711851] (RT) [Entered: 05/09/2023 10:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
