Latoya Reinhold, et al v. Jonathan Israel, et al
Defendant: COUNTY OF ORANGE, a public entity
Plaintiff / Appellee: LATOYA REINHOLD, individually and as successor-in-interest to Kurt Reinhold, S. R., minor, by and through their guardian ad litem, individually and as successors-in-interest to Kurt Reinhold, J. R., minor, by and through their guardian ad litem, Latoya Reinhold, individually and as successors-in-interest to Kurt Reinhold and JUDY REINHOLD-TUCKER, individually
Defendant / Appellant: JONATHAN ISRAEL, Deputy and EDUARDO DURAN, Deputy
Case Number: 23-55427
Filed: May 9, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2023 Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 07/24/2023, Appellants to file a motion or stipulation to dismiss, or contact the circuit mediator. See order for details. [12741036] (VS) [Entered: 06/22/2023 11:30 AM]
June 2, 2023 Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The conference previously scheduled for June 20, 2023, is canceled. By 06/23/2023, Appellants to file a motion or stipulation to dismiss, or contact the circuit mediator. See order for details. [12727455] (VS) [Entered: 06/02/2023 11:51 AM]
June 1, 2023 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties are directed to address the basis for this courts jurisdiction over this appeal. See Ballou v. McElvain, 29 F.4th 413, 421 (9th Cir. 2022) (noting that this courts jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from the denial of qualified immunity at summary judgment is limited to the question of whether the defendant would be entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law, assuming all factual disputes are resolved, and all reasonable inferences are drawn, in plaintiffs favor (citing Estate of Anderson v. Marsh, 985 F.3d 726, 731 (9th Cir. 2021))). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12726449] (WL) [Entered: 06/01/2023 11:06 AM]
May 19, 2023 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 06/20/2023, 2:00 p.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12719336] (VS) [Entered: 05/19/2023 01:26 PM]
May 16, 2023 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/16/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12717218]. [23-55427] (AD) [Entered: 05/16/2023 06:44 PM]
May 16, 2023 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Eduardo Duran and Jonathan Israel Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/16/2023. [12716936] [23-55427] (Cox, Jesse) [Entered: 05/16/2023 02:00 PM]
May 9, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Eduardo Duran and Jonathan Israel Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/16/2023. Transcript ordered by 06/08/2023. Transcript due 07/06/2023. Appellants Eduardo Duran and Jonathan Israel opening brief due 08/16/2023. Appellees J. R., S. R., Latoya Reinhold and Judy Reinhold-Tucker answering brief due 09/18/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12712585] (RT) [Entered: 05/09/2023 04:28 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Latoya Reinhold, et al v. Jonathan Israel, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: LATOYA REINHOLD, individually and as successor-in-interest to Kurt Reinhold
Represented By: Neil Kamal Gehlawat Esquire
Represented By: John C. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: S. R., minor, by and through their guardian ad litem, individually and as successors-in-interest to Kurt Reinhold
Represented By: Neil Kamal Gehlawat Esquire
Represented By: John C. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: J. R., minor, by and through their guardian ad litem, Latoya Reinhold, individually and as successors-in-interest to Kurt Reinhold
Represented By: Neil Kamal Gehlawat Esquire
Represented By: John C. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: JUDY REINHOLD-TUCKER, individually
Represented By: Robert S. Brown
Represented By: Neil Kamal Gehlawat Esquire
Represented By: John C. Taylor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: JONATHAN ISRAEL, Deputy
Represented By: Jonathan C. Bond
Represented By: Jesse K. Cox Esquire
Represented By: S. Frank Harrell
Represented By: Marlena R. Mlynarska Esquire
Represented By: Norman J. Watkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: EDUARDO DURAN, Deputy
Represented By: Jesse K. Cox Esquire
Represented By: S. Frank Harrell
Represented By: Marlena R. Mlynarska Esquire
Represented By: Norman J. Watkins
Represented By: Jonathan C. Bond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COUNTY OF ORANGE, a public entity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?