Raul Arellano v. Guldseth, et al
| RAUL ARELLANO |
| GULDSETH, Doctor, CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE, Health Care Provider to C.D.C.R., CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, In Charge of Wellbeing of Prisoner and S. ROBERTS, Chief Medical Executive |
| 23-55517 |
| June 12, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Filed Appellant Raul Arellano motion to appoint counsel and extension of time to file opening brief. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/26/2023. [12767717] (HH) [Entered: 08/03/2023 03:22 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellees Doctor Guldseth and S. Roberts Correspondence: Statement of Related Cases Pursuant to Circuit Rule 28-2.6. Date of service: 07/27/2023 [12763192] [23-55517] (Ganson, Jaime) [Entered: 07/27/2023 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellees Doctor Guldseth and S. Roberts Motion to take judicial notice of Exhibits from Plaintiff-Appellant Raul Arellano's litigation history in support of Motion to Revoke IFP Privilege and Summarily Affirm the Judgment.. Date of service: 07/27/2023. [12763175] [23-55517] (Ganson, Jaime) [Entered: 07/27/2023 09:07 AM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellees Doctor Guldseth and S. Roberts Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion to Revoke Appellant's IFP Privilege and Motion for Summary Affirmance]. Date of service: 07/27/2023. [12763165] [23-55517] (Ganson, Jaime) [Entered: 07/27/2023 08:55 AM] |
| Filing 9 Added Attorney Jaime Ganson for Appellees Guldseth and S. Roberts, in case 23-55517. [12762274] (HH) [Entered: 07/26/2023 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jaime M. Ganson (Office of the Attorney General, 1300 I Street, Suite 125, Sacramento, CA 95814) for Appellees Doctor Guldseth and S. Roberts. Date of service: 07/26/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12762227] [23-55517] (Ganson, Jaime) [Entered: 07/26/2023 08:26 AM] |
| Filing 7 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [12751391] (CKP) [Entered: 07/10/2023 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Raul Arellano motion to accept attached (Response). Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/02/2023. [12750882] (HH) [Entered: 07/07/2023 03:05 PM] |
| Filing 5 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. [12750871] (HH) [Entered: 07/07/2023 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Appellants motion for a stay of appellate proceedings pending the district courts decision on a motion for reconsideration is denied as unnecessary (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]). A review of the district court docket does not reflect that appellant filed a motion for reconsideration in the district court. Appellant remains obligated to comply with this courts June 13, 2023 order. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [12749950]--[Edited 07/06/2023 by SLM] (CKP) [Entered: 07/06/2023 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Raul Arellano motion to stay appellate proceedings. Deficiencies: None. [12742064] (HH) [Entered: 06/23/2023 12:48 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [12734812] (CKP) [Entered: 06/13/2023 11:51 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Raul Arellano opening brief due 08/04/2023. Appellees California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Health Care, Guldseth and S. Roberts answering brief due 09/05/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12733956] (ABT) [Entered: 06/12/2023 02:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
