Steven Walker, I v. USA, et al
| STEVEN ERIC WALKER I |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and DOES, 1 through 100 |
| 23-55525 |
| June 14, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): When the notice of appeal was filed, a timely motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4) was pending in the district court. Appellate proceedings are therefore held in abeyance until the district court decides the pending April 28, 2023 motion. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4); Leader Nat'l Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994) (notice of appeal becomes effective when timely tolling motions resolved). To challenge the district courts ruling on the motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time set by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk will serve this order on the district court. [12765297] (CKP) [Entered: 07/31/2023 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed original and 4 copies of Appellant Steven Eric Walker, I opening brief of 45 pages (Informal: No). Served on 07/24/2023. [12763578] (KWG) [Entered: 07/27/2023 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Steven Eric Walker I opening brief due 08/14/2023. Appellees Does, State of California and United States of America answering brief due 09/14/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12735677] (RT) [Entered: 06/14/2023 11:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
