Frederick Pina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
| FREDERICK DAVID PINA |
| STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 23-55614 |
| July 12, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| FREDERICK PINA V. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Frederick David Pina. Date of service: 08/01/2023. [12765708] [23-55614] (Pina, Frederick) [Entered: 08/01/2023 10:26 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Frederick David Pina response to Court order dated 09/01/2023. Date of service: 07/28/2023. [12764453] [23-55614] (Pina, Frederick) [Entered: 07/28/2023 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12759462] (AF) [Entered: 07/21/2023 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Frederick David Pina motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/13/2023. [12755711] (HH) [Entered: 07/14/2023 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Order to show cause docket fee due [12754384] (CKP) [Entered: 07/13/2023 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Frederick David Pina opening brief due 09/05/2023. [12753703] (JMR) [Entered: 07/12/2023 11:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Frederick Pina v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: FREDERICK DAVID PINA | |
| Represented By: | Frederick David Pina |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
