Vien-Phuong Ho v. The City of Long Beach, Public Works, et al
| VIEN-PHUONG THI HO |
| THE CITY OF LONG BEACH, PUBLIC WORKS, Municiple Entity, official capacity, JEFFREY SORERRO, Representative of City of Long Beach, individual and official capacity, DIKO MELKONIAN, Representative of City of Long Beach, individual and official capacity, CRAIG A. BECK, Director, individual and official capacity, MALY OUM, DIN PHO, NEDA ROSHANIAN, individual and official capacity, LONG BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT, DOES, 1 through 10, individual and official capacity and JOSEPH GLUDT, Sergeant (Badge #5428) |
| 23-55626 |
| July 18, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 08/14/2023. Transcript due 09/13/2023. Appellant Vien-Phuong Thi Ho opening brief due 10/23/2023. Appellees Craig A. Beck, Does, Joseph Gludt, Long Beach Police Department, Diko Melkonian, Maly Oum, Din Pho, Neda Roshanian, Jeffrey Sorerro and The City of Long Beach, Public Works answering brief due 11/22/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12757388] (JMR) [Entered: 07/18/2023 02:55 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
