Cheryl Sauer v. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc., et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHERYL SAUER, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and DOES, 1-10 Inclusive
Case Number: 23-55636
Filed: July 20, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2023 Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 08/24/2023, 1:00 p.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12767982] (VS) [Entered: 08/04/2023 08:38 AM]
August 1, 2023 Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/01/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12765901]. [23-55636] (AD) [Entered: 08/01/2023 12:44 PM]
August 1, 2023 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Cheryl Sauer Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/01/2023. [12765558] [23-55636] (Friedman, Todd) [Entered: 08/01/2023 08:42 AM]
August 1, 2023 Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within five (5) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12765539] (BLS) [Entered: 08/01/2023 08:24 AM]
July 20, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Cheryl Sauer Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/27/2023. Appellant Cheryl Sauer opening brief due 09/18/2023. Appellees Does and SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. answering brief due 10/18/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12758845] (JBS) [Entered: 07/20/2023 01:16 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Cheryl Sauer v. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHERYL SAUER, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Adrian Bacon Esquire
Represented By: Todd M. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Represented By: Matthew David Powers Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOES, 1-10 Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?