Carol Wassmann v. South Orange County Community College District, et al
| CAROL ELAINE WASSMANN |
| SOUTH ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, KARIMA FELDHUS, ROBERT BRUMUCCI, GLENN ROQUEMORE, LEWIS LONG, KATHERINE SCHMEIDLER and DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 23-55671 |
| July 28, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed original and 6 copies of Appellant Carol Elaine Wassmann opening brief of 12 pages (Informal: Yes) and 7 copies of excerpts of record in 1 volume. Served on 09/22/2023. [12798700] (KT) [Entered: 09/25/2023 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of the district court docket reflects that the district court granted appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and that such permission has not been revoked. Accordingly, appellants in forma pauperis status continues in this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is therefore unnecessary. Appellants request not to participate in electronic filing (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is unnecessary because appellant, proceeding pro se, is exempt from the courts electronic filing requirement. See 9th Cir. R. 25-5. Any electronically submitted filing by appellees in this case involving a pro se litigant who is not registered for the Appellate Electronic Filing System must be served pursuant to Fed. R. App. Proc. 25(c)(1). See 9th Cir. R. 25-5(f)(2). The opening brief is due October 11, 2023 The answering brief is due November 13, 2023 The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, appellant is not required to file excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30 1.3. If appellant does not file excerpts of record, appellees must file Supplemental Excerpts of Record that contain all of the documents that are cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30 1.4, as well as the docu ments that are cited in the answering brief. See id. [12786326] (JMR) [Entered: 09/05/2023 11:26 AM] |
| Filing 5 Received Appellant Carol Elaine Wassmann copy of In Forma Pauperis documents from District Court. [12776143] (NAC) [Entered: 08/17/2023 01:04 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Carol Elaine Wassmann motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12774405] (NAC) [Entered: 08/15/2023 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Carol Elaine Wassmann motion for corresponding via U.S. mail. Deficiencies: None. [12774402] (NAC) [Entered: 08/15/2023 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk: MCD: Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12764915] (CKP) [Entered: 07/31/2023 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Carol Elaine Wassmann opening brief due 09/25/2023. Appellees Robert Brumucci, Does, Karima Feldhus, Lewis Long, Glenn Roquemore, Katherine Schmeidler and South Orange County Community College District answering brief due 10/24/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12764614] (ABT) [Entered: 07/28/2023 04:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
