Sky Boles v. James Kaddo, et al
SKY BOLES |
JAMES KADDO, Judge and WILLIAM DOSON, Judge |
23-55736 |
August 22, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Americans w/Disabilities Act-Empl |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Motion to dismiss case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 08/23/2023). This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [12810791] (CKP) [Entered: 10/17/2023 10:59 AM] |
Filing 4 Mail returned on 10/05/2023 addressed to Sky Boles, re: [ # 1 ] Case Opening Information, [ # 2 ] Clerk Order. Returned envelope notes: Return to sender, attempted - not known, unable to forward. Resending to: case files; no forwarding address found. [12805955] (JMR) [Entered: 10/06/2023 10:16 AM] |
Filing 3 Mail returned on 09/11/2023 addressed to Sky Boles, re: [ # 1 ] Case Opening Information. Returned envelope notes: Return to sender, unable to forward. Resending to: 521 Belmont Street, S, Unit A, Glendale, CA 91205 (with a copy of 08/23/23 Order [ # 2 ]). [12791359]--[Edited: address updated. 09/13/2023 by SLM] (JMR) [Entered: 09/13/2023 10:05 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Order to show cause docket fee due [12779471] (CKP) [Entered: 08/23/2023 11:32 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Sky Boles opening brief due 10/16/2023. [12779137] (ABT) [Entered: 08/22/2023 04:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.