A. R. L. v. City of Fullerton, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: A. R. L., a minor, individually and as Successor in Interest to Jesus Estrada Leon, deceased, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Yakensy Martinez
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF FULLERTON, a Municipal entity, MATTHEW GREEN, RENE VALDES and DOES, 1-8, inclusive
Case Number: 23-55751
Filed: August 30, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2023 Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: Appellant A. R. L. opening brief due 01/05/2024. Appellees City of Fullerton, Does, Matthew Green and Rene Valdes answering brief due 02/05/2024. Appellants optional reply brief is due within 21 days afer service of the answering brief. [12805161] (VS) [Entered: 10/05/2023 11:14 AM]
September 13, 2023 Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) Scott Wm. Davenport for party(s) Appellee City of Fullerton Appellee Matthew Green Appellee Rene Valdes. [12791554] (RL) [Entered: 09/13/2023 12:14 PM]
September 13, 2023 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Scott Wm. Davenport (Jones Mayer, 3777 N. Harbor Blvd., Fullerton, CA 92835) for Appellees City of Fullerton, Matthew Green and Rene Valdes. Date of service: 09/13/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12791546] [23-55751] (Davenport, Scott) [Entered: 09/13/2023 12:10 PM]
September 13, 2023 Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 10/05/2023, 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled at 10:00 a.m.). [12791353] (VS) [Entered: 09/13/2023 10:00 AM]
September 11, 2023 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 10/05/2023, 10:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12789896] (VS) [Entered: 09/11/2023 01:54 PM]
September 11, 2023 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/11/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12789784]. [23-55751] (AD) [Entered: 09/11/2023 12:44 PM]
September 11, 2023 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant A. R. L. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/11/2023. [12789592] [23-55751] (Dunn, Brian) [Entered: 09/11/2023 10:44 AM]
August 30, 2023 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant A. R. L. Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/06/2023. Transcript ordered by 09/27/2023. Transcript due 10/27/2023. Appellant A. R. L. opening brief due 12/06/2023. Appellees City of Fullerton, Does, Matthew Green and Rene Valdes answering brief due 01/05/2024. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12783401] (JBS) [Entered: 08/30/2023 10:15 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: A. R. L. v. City of Fullerton, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: A. R. L., a minor, individually and as Successor in Interest to Jesus Estrada Leon, deceased, by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Yakensy Martinez
Represented By: Brian T. Dunn Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF FULLERTON, a Municipal entity
Represented By: Harold Wesley Potter
Represented By: Denise Lynch Rocawich
Represented By: James Touchstone
Represented By: Scott Wm. Davenport
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MATTHEW GREEN
Represented By: Harold Wesley Potter
Represented By: Denise Lynch Rocawich
Represented By: James Touchstone
Represented By: Scott Wm. Davenport
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RENE VALDES
Represented By: Harold Wesley Potter
Represented By: Denise Lynch Rocawich
Represented By: James Touchstone
Represented By: Scott Wm. Davenport
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOES, 1-8, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?