Ashley Blackmon v. Kevin Orth, et al
| CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS and DOES, 1-10, inclusive |
| ASHLEY BLACKMON, an individual |
| BEVERLY HILLS POLICE SERGEANT KEVIN ORTH, JAMES KEENAGHAN, BEVERLY HILLS POLICE OFFICER ADAM FALOSSI, (#04678), BEVERLY HILLS POLICE OFFICER JONATHAN DE LA CRUZ and BEVERLY HILLS POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL DOWNS, all sued in their individual capacities |
| 23-55787 |
| September 19, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Pursuant to the parties stipulatstipulated motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]), this appeal is voluntarily dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and fees on appeal A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [12806440] (AF) [Entered: 10/06/2023 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Jonathan De La Cruz, Michael Downs, Adam Falossi, James Keenaghan and Kevin Orth Joint Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 10/02/2023. [12802444] [23-55787] (Tollison, Jeanne) [Entered: 10/02/2023 12:56 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 10/06/2023, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12801203] (BLS) [Entered: 09/29/2023 09:21 AM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/27/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12799927]. [23-55787] (AD) [Entered: 09/27/2023 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Jonathan De La Cruz, Michael Downs, Adam Falossi, James Keenaghan and Kevin Orth Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/27/2023. [12799804] [23-55787] (Tollison, Jeanne) [Entered: 09/27/2023 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties must address the basis for this courts jurisdiction over this appeal. See Ballou v. McElvain, 29 F.4th 413, 421 (9th Cir. 2022) (explaining that this courts jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from the denial of qualified immunity at summary judgment is limited to the question of whether the defendant would be entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law, assuming all factual disputes are resolved, and all reasonable inferences are drawn, in plaintiffs favor (citation and internal marks omitted)). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12799639] (AF) [Entered: 09/27/2023 09:26 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Jonathan De La Cruz, Michael Downs, Adam Falossi, James Keenaghan and Kevin Orth Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/26/2023. Transcript ordered by 10/13/2023. Transcript due 11/13/2023. Appellants Jonathan De La Cruz, Michael Downs, Adam Falossi, James Keenaghan and Kevin Orth opening brief due 12/22/2023. Appellee Ashley Blackmon answering brief due 01/22/2024. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12794758] (JBS) [Entered: 09/19/2023 10:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
