N. R., II, et al v. Del Mar Unified School District
| D. R. |
| N. R. II |
| DEL MAR UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT |
| 23-55804 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Civil Rights - Education |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) Paul Vincent Carelli for party(s) Appellee Del Mar Unified School District, in case 23-55804. [12803614] (NAC) [Entered: 10/03/2023 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Paul Vincent Carelli IV (Artiano Shinoff 3636 Fourth Avenue, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92103) for Appellee Del Mar Unified School District. Date of service: 10/03/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12803601] [23-55804] (Carelli, Paul) [Entered: 10/03/2023 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed order (BRIDGET S. BADE, KENNETH K. LEE and LAWRENCE VANDYKE) Appellants motion for reconsideration (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) of the order filed on September 27, 2023, is denied. No further motions for reconsideration or other relief concerning the September 27, 2023 order will be entertained.[12802515] (WL) [Entered: 10/02/2023 01:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant N. R., II motion for reconsideration of dispositive Judge Order of 09/27/2023. Date of service: 10/02/2023. [12802167] [23-55804] (R., N.) [Entered: 10/02/2023 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (BRIDGET S. BADE, KENNETH K. LEE and LAWRENCE VANDYKE): Appellant has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.). Appellant has other adequate means . . . to attain the relief . . . she desires, such as filing her own motion to seal in the district court. Bauman v. United States District Court, 557 F.2d 650, 654 (9th Cir. 1977). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied. The motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) for a stay of the district courts August 11, 2023 order, denying defendants motion to seal, is denied. [12800122] (AF) [Entered: 09/27/2023 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant N. R., II EMERGENCY motion for administrative stay and motion for stay pending appeal. Deficiencies: None.. [12799191] (NAC) [Entered: 09/26/2023 01:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant N. R. II opening brief due 11/27/2023. Appellee Del Mar Unified School District answering brief due 12/27/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12798071] (RT) [Entered: 09/25/2023 10:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
