Rosas Bernal v. Garland
| JOSE ROSAS BERNAL |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 23-588 |
| April 5, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. Proceedings in this petition for review are stayed pending this courts en banc decision in De La Rosa-Rodriguez v. Garland, No. 20-71923, or further order of this court. [Entered: 09/26/2023 03:33 PM]
|
| Filing 18 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 16 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 07/31/2023 03:50 PM] |
|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 16 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/26/2023 08:56 AM]
|
| Filing 16 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/25/2023 07:06 AM] |
| Filing 15 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioner Jose Rosas Bernal received. [Entered: 06/26/2023 03:37 PM] |
|
Filing 14
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioner Jose Rosas Bernal is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 06/23/2023 11:34 AM]
|
| Filing 13 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Jose Rosas Bernal. [Entered: 06/22/2023 05:53 PM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/03/2023 01:41 PM]
|
| Filing 11 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/01/2023 09:52 AM] |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 04/19/2023 08:48 AM] |
| Filing 9 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Erik R. Quick for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/07/2023 10:53 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Erik R. Quick for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/07/2023 06:58 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Erik R. Quick for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/07/2023 05:10 AM] |
| Filing 6 Fee Paid by Jose Rosas Bernal. Fee Receipt Number: A09-2603405-ACMS. [Entered: 04/06/2023 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 5/10/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 5/31/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 7/10/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 9/7/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 04/05/2023 04:16 PM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 4/5/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-588 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/05/2023 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 3/7/2023. [Entered: 04/05/2023 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 04/05/2023 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 04/05/2023 04:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Rosas Bernal v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JOSE ROSAS BERNAL | |
| Represented By: | Alex C. Hazel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Represented By: | Mr. Erik R. Quick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
