McDaniel v. Warden
Petitioner: TYSON TERRELL MCDANIEL
Respondent: BRUNO STOLC and WARDEN
Case Number: 23-654
Filed: April 13, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FILED. A. Wallace TASHIMA, Sidney R. THOMAS, Danielle J. FORREST The application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. 2254 habeas corpus petition in the district court is denied. The applicant has not made a prima facie showing under 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(2) that: (A) the claim relies on a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable; or (B)(i) the factual predicate for the claim could not have been discovered previously through the exercise of due diligence; and (ii) the facts underlying the claim, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, but for constitutional error, no reasonable factfinder would have found the applicant guilty of the underlying offense. Any pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this case. DENIED. [Entered: 08/21/2023 03:28 PM]
August 10, 2023 Filing 6 TERMINATED participation of Respondent Warden. [Entered: 08/10/2023 04:59 PM]
August 10, 2023 Filing 5 ADDED Respondent Bruno Stolc [Entered: 08/10/2023 04:57 PM]
April 17, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE of change of address filed by Petitioner Tyson Terrell McDaniel. [Entered: 04/19/2023 02:32 PM]
April 13, 2023 Filing 3 SOS DOCKETING NOTICE. Application for Permission to File a Second or Successive Habeas Corpus Petition has been opened and assigned the Ninth Circuit case number 23-654. All subsequent correspondence regarding this matter will be added to your file to be considered at the same time the cause is brought before the court. The case number and the title of your case should be shown in the upper right corner of any correspondence to the clerk's office, and should be directed to the above address pursuant to Circuit Rule 25-1. [Entered: 04/13/2023 01:16 PM]
April 13, 2023 Filing 2 CASE OPENED. Application for Leave to File Second or Successive 2255 Motion has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 4/13/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-654 has been assigned to this case. [Entered: 04/13/2023 01:14 PM]
April 13, 2023 Filing 1 Application for Leave to File 28 U.S.C. 2255 Second or Successive Motion. [Entered: 04/13/2023 01:11 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: McDaniel v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: TYSON TERRELL MCDANIEL
Represented By: Tyson Terrell McDaniel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BRUNO STOLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: WARDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?